Joe's Crab Shack tests no-tipping policy. Will more restaurant chains follow?

Joe's Crab Shack has announced that it will eliminate tipping at 18 of its 131 restaurants and give workers higher base wages. The policy adoption makes it the first national restaurant chain in the US to seriously test a no-tipping model.

Eric Risberg/AP/File
Imported Dungeness crabs are displayed for sale at Fisherman's Wharf, Thursday, Nov. 5, 2015, in San Francisco. Joe's Crab Shack is trying a no tipping policy.

At Joe’s Crab Shack, the next time a server delivers great service, they might not be doing it for a tip.

Joe’s Crab Shack has become the first national chain to seriously test a no-tipping business model that has gained traction in the fine dining world over the past few months. CEO Ray Blachette told analysts last week  that the restaurant chain has been testing a model that gets rid of tipping and pays staff higher wages at a few locations for several months. Over the past 30 days, Joe's Crab Shack has expanded the trial to include 18 of its 131 US locations, according to Nation’s Restaurant News. 

In October, restauranteur and Union Square Hospitality Group CEO Danny Meyer announced tipping would be eliminated at all of the company’s restaurants by the end of this year. Joe’s Crab Shack's status as a national chain has the potential to push the wage model into the mainstream. The expansion of the no-tipping test for Joe’s Crab Shack is due to positive performance reviews from trial locations.

“What makes us optimistic is the restaurant that has been in test the longest is gaining the most traction,” Mr. Blanchette told analysts. 

Joe's Crab Shack parent company Ignite Restaurants says the wages for servers will start at $14 an hour and may vary from server to server depending on performance, according to Restaurant Business. Kitchen and wait staff will also receive pay boosts. Blanchette hopes the wage model will solve many issues that stem from a tip-based model, including competition among workers and a separation between server and kitchen staff. 

"Servers, hosts, bartenders are paid now higher, fixed, hourly wages," Blanchette told CNBC, "and it's expected to result in an improved team atmosphere, a significant reduction in turnover and greater financial security for the employees."

Previously, private restaurants and fine dining institutions have largely championed the wage model for restaurants. An increasingly visible movement for a $15 minimum wage has added pressure. However, for many of these restaurants a change from tipping to higher wages has been accompanied by higher base prices for diners. In Seattle, where a $15-an-hour minimum wage took effect this past April, Ivar’s Seafood Bars increased prices by 21 percent in response. 

There is also major pushback against the no-tipping policy from industry groups like the National Restaurant Association. The association estimates the “median hourly earnings for servers range from $16 to $22, depending on experience.” By those estimates, removing tipping in favor of higher wages would actually result in a pay cut for many servers, which could cause many to leave the industry, the group argues. 

“The tipped culture is still what draws many people into our industry,”  Christin Fernandez, a spokeswoman for the National Restaurant Association, told  The New York Times.

Joe’s Crab Shack’s no-tipping experiment could provide a clearer example of the impact higher wages and no tipping has on a national scale.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Joe's Crab Shack tests no-tipping policy. Will more restaurant chains follow?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today