Tim Hortons deal is hurting Burger King's image

Burger King’s proposed $11 billion acquisition of  Tim Hortons was widely characterized as a canny tax-saving maneuver as soon as it was announced. But what Burger King might gain monetarily might not balance the ill will the merger has generated with customers who see the burger chain’s action as unpatriotic.

Sean Kilpatrick/The CanadianPress/AP/FIle
A Burger King sign and a Tim Hortons sign are displayed on St. Laurent Boulevard in Ottawa, Canada last month.

The home of the Angry Whopper is the focus of angry consumers. Burger King Corp.’s proposed $11 billion acquisition of Canadian chain Tim Hortons was widely characterized as a canny tax-saving maneuver as soon as it was announced. The combined entity’s headquarters would be in Canada where corporate tax rates are lower. But what Burger King might gain monetarily might not balance the ill will the merger has generated with customers who see the burger chain’s action as unpatriotic.

Burger King is feeling a different kind of whiplash than it did two years ago when it launched the Whiplash Whopper in Canada.

According to the YouGov BrandIndex daily brand consumer perception research, Burger King’s consumer perception levels have dropped to its lowest in four-and-a-half years. The 30,000 respondents polled were asked, “If you’ve heard anything about Burger King in the last two weeks, through advertising, news or word of mouth, was it positive or negative?”  Burger King’s Buzz score plummeted from a +13 on Aug. 20, 2014, to a -1 today. A score can range from 100 to -100 with a zero score equaling neutral, so Burger King’s Buzz is slightly more negative overall than positive.

It’s worth noting that Burger King’s -1 score ties it with McDonald’s Corp., which has been pummeled with reports about its wages in the U.S., the quality of its meat in China and the cleanliness of its stores in Russia.

Burger King’s Facebook page has been filled with negative comments such as this from David Villarreal: “You greedy, seditious, traitors! I was a lifelong BK customer and I will NEVER support your businesses again! You should loose the right to conduct business in the country that made you such a successful resturaunt [sic]. Enjoy Canada you greedy Traitors!”

Burger King has responded on Facebook that the chain’s headquarters will remain in Miami (however, the holding company will be based in Canada, which will yield some tax savings). On its page, the chain wrote, “We hear you. We’re not moving, we’re just growing and finding ways to serve you better.

“As part of the announcement made today, both Burger King Corp. and Tim Hortons will continue to operate as independent brands. We’ll just be under common ownership. Our headquarters will remain in Miami where we were founded more than 60 years ago and business will continue as usual at our restaurants around the world.

“The decision to create a new global QSR leader with Tim Hortons is not tax-driven – it’s about global growth for both brands. BKC will continue to pay all of our federal, state and local U.S. taxes.

“We’re proud of the heritage of Burger King and will maintain our long-standing commitment to our employees, franchisees and the local communities we serve.

“The WHOPPER isn’t going anywhere.”

Burger King Corp. should be reporting Q3 sales at the end of October. That will be the real measure of consumer anger over the proposed business combination.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tim Hortons deal is hurting Burger King's image
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today