McDonald’s, Taco Bell, KFC named ‘worst tasting’ in Consumer Reports survey

McDonald's and Taco Bell are among the biggest restaurant chains in the world, but US customers largely prefer smaller, hipper chains like In-N-Out and Chipotle, according to a new Consumer Reports survey. 

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters/File
Pedestrians pass a Chipotle Mexican restaurant in Arlington, Va. Fast-food titans McDonald's, Taco Bell, and KFC are conquering the globe, but they are losing to the likes of In-N-Out Burger, Chipotle Mexican Grill, and Chick-fil-A in the US, according to Consumer Reports' latest fast-food survey released on July 2, 2014.

The biggest names in fast food are also among the least loved in America, according to a new survey from Consumer Reports.

The publication’s annual fast food survey, released Wednesday, found giants like McDonald’s, KFC, Burger King, and Taco Bell all lagging behind their newer, hipper fast-casual counterparts, like In-N-Out Burger and Chipotle.

“After devouring 96,208 meals at 65 chains, Consumer Reports readers told us that quality of the food has become more important in their dining decisions, and convenience of location is less so,” the Consumer Reports release on the study read. "They could be reasons the traditional fast-food chains are losing their edge: Diners, especially younger adults in the millennial generation, may be more willing go out of their way to get a tasty meal.”

Consumer Reports evaluated food quality, value, and service at the nation’s biggest chains in four categories: burgers; chicken; sandwiches and subs; and burritos. In the “taste” rankings, McDonald’s finished dead last among 20 burger restaurants, while KFC and Taco Bell each ranked No. 8 of 8 in the chicken and burrito categories. In the subs rankings, Subway, the chain with the most locations in the world, came in second to last, sandwiched (pardon the phrase) between Arby’s and Au Bon Pain.

On the other end, a few familiar, if less mammoth, names came out on top. Chick-fil-A, the Atlanta-based eatery known for its chicken sandwiches, came in first among chicken chains. In-N-Out, the primarily West Coast chain, was one of the top burger joints along with The Habit Burger Grill and Five Guys’ Burgers and Fries. Chipotle topped the burrito rankings.

Consumer Reports’ findings, based on responses from 32,405 readers, seemed to confirm what financial reports have been suggesting for years now: The titans that have dominated the US restaurant landscape for more than half a century are losing ground, at least in the US. McDonald’s and KFC are still hugely profitable, but most of their expansion efforts are now focused overseas in Europe and Asia as sales in the US slip. McDonald’s saw a 1.7 percent decrease in same-store sales last quarter.

Their smaller, slightly more regional competitors, meanwhile, are faring much better. Chick-fil-A, which is heavily concentrated in the southeastern US, beat KFC in US sales by about $800 million last year, even though it has less than half of the locations.

See Consumer Reports’ full survey, here

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.