Does renouncing US citizenship really save money?

Renouncing US citizenship is a growing trend among high-earning expats living abroad, including Tina Turner and Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin. But does it make economic sense? 

Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP/File
Singer Tina Turner performs on stage, during a concert at the O2 Arena, in London. Turner is one of several wealthy Americans who have given up their US citizenship in recent years. Doing so can potentially be a tax-saver, but the process itself is costly.

What do Tina Turner and Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin have in common? More than you might think. Both celebrities recently gave up their U.S. citizenship, highlighting a growing trend among high-earning expatriates living abroad. Last year, a record 3,000 Americans renounced their citizenship, tripling 2012’s total.

Here’s a look at why some people are making that decision as well as the cost of doing so.

Why give up your American citizenship?

Unlike most countries, the United States government taxes the income of its citizens regardless of where they live. This is known as citizenship-based taxation. It’s worth noting, though, that this only affects expatriates earning more than $97,600. If you earn less than that while living overseas, you’re exempt from taxes, meaning handing in your U.S. passport wouldn’t make a huge financial difference. In fact, the fees associated with doing so might make you think twice about giving up your American citizenship.

There are also consequences to renouncing citizenship. It means giving up the benefits accorded to U.S. citizens, such as the right to vote in U.S. elections, easy access to the U.S. job market, unhindered travel in and out of the country, and government protection when abroad (for instance, if you run into trouble in a war-torn nation).

Fees

As of Sept. 12, the price of renouncing one’s citizenship skyrocketed from $450 to $2,350. In a memo published on its website, the State Department justified this drastic increase by explaining that the process requires “U.S. consular officers overseas to spend substantial amounts of time to accept, process, and adjudicate cases.” As well as handling stacks of paperwork, consular officers have to schedule multiple interviews with a person who opts to renounce his or her citizenship. The State Department adds that the previous fee was subsidized and that the updated price tag is “reflective of the true cost” of the service.

Expatriation tax

Along with the aforementioned processing fee, some people renouncing their citizenship will also be hit with an expatriation tax, or “exit tax.” This tax applies to anyone with either an aver Since this tax applies to high-earning individuals, it’s often viewed as the government’s final way of asking expatriates whether they’re positive they want to go through with the process. For those who can afford this one-time tax—like Ms. Turner and Mr. Saverin—the answer is a resounding “yes,” as it spares them years of having to pay significant U.S. taxes while enjoying life abroad.

Bottom line

If you reside in America’s upper tax bracket and live overseas, it may make financial sense to renounce your U.S. citizenship. Otherwise, you’ll want to think twice before setting off on what is by all accounts an arduous process. After all, despite the hype surrounding the growing number of expatriates surrendering their citizenship, there are still roughly 6 million Americans living abroad who are choosing to hold on to their American passports.

As with any important decision that affects your bank account, it’s crucial to do your homework before getting the wheels in motion.

 The post Does Renouncing Your U.S. Citizenship Really Save You Money? appeared first on NerdWallet News.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.