Hostess Brands strike puts Twinkies maker in jeopardy

Hostess Brands factory workers nationwide are on strike, protesting a contract that would cut wages and drastically reduce benefits. Hostess Brands warned in a statement last week that a widespread strike would prompt the company to liquidate and lay off the bulk of its workforce. 

Paul Sakuma/AP/File
This January 2012 file photo shows Hostess Twinkies on display at a grocery store in Santa Clara, Calif. Unionized Hostess Brands workers across the country are on strike, protesting wage and benefits cuts.

Several hundred workers at a Hostess plant in northeast Philadelphia were off the job honoring a bakers' union strike at the bankrupt company's plants across the country.

The walkout that began Friday came after Hostess Brands Inc. imposed a contract that would cut wages and benefits 27 to 32 percent, with an immediate 8 percent wage reduction, the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union said. Officials say the company stopped making contributions to the workers' pensions last year, and 92 percent of union members voted to reject the contract in September.

Hostess, which makes Twinkies, Wonder Bread, and Ding Dongs, filed for Chapter 11 protection in January, its second trip through bankruptcy court in less than a decade.

About 330 workers at the Philadelphia plant have joined several dozen workers from Maine who arrived to picket, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported. Only some Hostess workers are free to strike, according to a union fact sheet, but the existing contract allows striking workers to set up picket lines at other plants, and workers at those plants can honor the picket lines.

Thousands of workers are protesting the company's action across the country, James Condran, an international union representative who was at the Philadelphia plant, told the paper.

Hostess Brands Inc. acknowledged "concessions (that) are tough" but urged workers to remain on the job "to rebuild the company."

Hostess warned in a statement last week that a widespread strike would prompt the company "to liquidate if we are unable to produce or deliver products" and it would then lay off most of its 18,300-member workforce "and focus on selling its assets to the highest bidders."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.