More US companies jump into social and political debates

Nike received kudos and criticism on Monday after releasing an advertisement that referred to former NFL player Colin Kaepernick's controversial police brutality protests. From Patagonia to Starbucks, retailers are increasingly making public statements on social issues.

Mark Lennihan/STF/AP
People walk past a Nike store in New York. The company has been criticized for an advertisement featuring former NFL player Colin Kaepernick, known for his controversial protests of police brutality during the national anthem.

Nike's "Just Do It" campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick is a rare example of a brand jumping into a divisive issue uninvited. Still, like it or not, American companies are increasingly being pulled into the country's political and cultural wars.

Here's a look at other companies that recently have courted controversy or been caught in political turbulence.

Patagonia sues Trump over monuments

The outdoor retailer dived head first into politics last year with a campaign against President Trump's move to dramatically shrink two Utah national monuments. On the day of Mr. Trump's announcement, the California-based retailer replaced its usual home page with a black screen and stark message: "The President Stole Your Land." The company also filed a lawsuit to block the planned reduction to Utah's Bears Ears National Monument. The move sparked a furious response from Trump and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, who accused the company of lying. But the campaign was in keeping with Patagonia's longtime environmental advocacy. The company had lobbied hard for the designation of Bears Ears, created by former President Barack Obama in 2016. Other outdoor retailers including The North Face, Keen, Black Diamond, and REI also protested Trump's plan on social media, but Patagonia was the only one to file a lawsuit.

Delta Airlines ends discounts for NRA members

Delta Airlines was only one of many companies that made policy changes in the wake of the Feb. 14 school shooting in Parkland, Fla., but it faced the most notable retaliation. The airliner stopped offering fare discounts to National Rifle Association members after the massacre, a decision the company said was an effort to remove itself from the debate, not take sides. Still, Georgia state lawmakers swiftly punished the Atlanta-based company by killing a proposed tax break on fuel. It was a stunning and risky rebuke to one of Georgia's largest private employers. Delta stood by its decision, and in March, the company donated three round-trip charter flights that allowed hundreds of Parkland's Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School students to participate in protests against gun violence in Washington.

Citigroup limits customers' ability to buy and sell guns

Citigroup became the first bank to announce policy changes after the Parkland massacre, announcing it would require its clients and business customers not to sell a gun to anyone who hasn't passed a background check or anyone under the age of 21. The bank also will not allow its customers to sell what are known as bump stocks and high-capacity magazines. Other financial industry players followed with their own measures, including Bank of America, which cut off financing to companies that make AR-style rifles. The Republican chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Sen. Mike Crapo of Idah, sent letters of protest accusing both banks of trying to usurp the role of policy makers. Retailers including Walmart Inc., Dicks Sporting Goods, Kroger Co., and L.L. Bean also responded to the shooting with measures tightening their restrictions on gun sales.

Starbucks has hard conversations about race and bias

Starbucks faced a backlash three years ago when it encouraged employees to write "Race Together" on its coffee cups to encourage a national conversation on race amid protests over police killings of black men. The initiative was in line with the Seattle-based company's efforts to project a progressive image, but social media users ridiculed it as a stunt to drive up sales. Then-CEO Howard Schultz defended the campaign as part of a broader push that included investing in underserved communities and striving to diversify its workforce. Starbucks again became embroiled in racial issues earlier this year over the arrest of two black men at one of its stores in Philadelphia. CEO Kevin Johnson moved swiftly to quell the uproar, meeting personally with the two men and closing most of its US stores for an afternoon in May to conduct anti-bias training.

Merck starts a wave of departures from Trump's business councils

Merck CEO Kenneth Frazier, at the time one of only four African-Americans leading a Fortune 500 company, was the first to resign from Trump's business councils last summer over the president's remarks on the white nationalist protests in Charlottesville, Va. The president lashed out immediately, criticizing Frazier on Twitter over drug pricing. Some business leaders quickly followed Frazier's lead, including the CEOs of Under Armour and Intel. Others, including the heads Walmart and Johnson & Johnson, publicly condemned Trump's remarks but initially resisted pressure to leave the councils. Within days, however, the ballooning uproar pushed the companies to shift course, and the panels fell apart.

Uber and other tech companies protest against travel ban

Shortly after Trump took office in 2017, then-Uber CEO Travis Kalanick quit Trump's council of business leaders after an outcry from Uber customers and employees who were upset about the administration's travel ban on people from seven majority-Muslim countries. Other Silicon Valley giants also took a strong stand against the ban in ads, including Google, Apple, Microsoft, eBay, Netflix, Facebook, and Twitter. Through ads, public statements, and court filings, CEOs spoke out about the reliance of high tech on immigrants. Tech companies also spoke out forcefully against the Trump administration's decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which allows some people brought to the company illegally as children to stay.

Bank of America protests North Carolina bathroom bill

As the largest North Carolina-based company, Bank of America found itself squarely in the middle of the heated debate over a state law that required transgender people to use restrooms corresponding to the sex on their birth certificates in many public buildings. The bill prompted businesses, sporting events, conventions, and entertainers to pull out of the state in a yearlong economic backlash. Bank of America was among the leading critics of the bill, saying it was bad for business. The bank then supported a compromise bill last year that removed the requirement but also made clear that only state legislators – not local government or school officials – can make rules for public restrooms from now on. Other companies, including IBM, were skeptical of the replacement law.

Nordstrom stops selling Ivanka Trump's clothing line

Nordstrom incurred Trump's wrath last year when it stopped selling his daughter Ivanka's clothing and accessories. The move came amid a social media campaign called "Grab Your Wallet," urging a boycott of stores that stocked Ivanka Trump or Donald Trump products. But Nordstrom said its decision was based on the sales performance of the first daughter's brand. Other retailers have attempted a delicate balance when it comes to the Ivanka Trump brand, with some scaling back on the products or removing them from their online sites.

Harley-Davidson moves motorcycle production overseas

Several companies have been pulled into controversy by Trump himself. Most recently, Harley-Davidson drew the president's ire when it announced plans to move production of motorcycles sold in Europe to facilities outside the United States, citing tariffs imposed by the European Union to retaliate for tariffs Trump imposed on a host of EU products. Trump said last month that his administration is courting other motorcycle companies that want to move to the US.

Other companies prompt Trump's criticism

Amazon is a favorite Trump target, with the president earlier this year criticizing the online retailer's business deal with the US Postal Service. Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Toyota have also been on the receiving end of Trump's Twitter tirades. In December 2016, shares of Lockheed Martin slumped when Trump, then the president-elect, lambasted the cost of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter built by the defense giant.

This story was reported by the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to More US companies jump into social and political debates
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today