Why did United's chief step down so abruptly?

United Continental's chief executive Jeff Smisek – as well as two other senior executives – is stepping down as investigators continue to look into the airline's ties with a former Port Authority chairman.

Shannon Stapleton/Reuters/File
Jeff Smisek, then chief executive officer of Continental, speaks during a news conference announcing the merger between Continental and United Airlines in New York, in this file photo taken May 3, 2010. United Continental Holdings Inc said Chief Executive Smisek had stepped down and named CSX Corp Chief Operating Office Oscar Munoz as his replacement, effective immediately.

United Continental announced Tuesday that its chairman and chief executive Jeff Smisek had stepped down amid a federal investigation into improprieties with a former Port Authority chairman.

The shift in leadership came so abruptly that a pay package hadn’t even been negotiated for Mr. Smisek’s replacement, Oscar Munoz. Mr. Munoz is a United board member and chief operating officer of railway operator CSX Corp. 

Smisek will receive a separation payment of $4.9 million, as well as stock worth nearly $3.5 million, the company said in a regulatory filing.

Two other senior executives – executive vice president Irene Foxhall and senior vice president Mark Anderson – are also leaving. Both had been in charge of government affairs. 

United confirmed that the departures were “in connection with the company's previously disclosed internal investigation related to the federal investigation associated with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.”

“The investigations are ongoing and the company continues to cooperate with the government,” said the company.

The probe centers on whether United gave former Port Authority chairman David Samson preferential treatment. The Associated Press reports:

United began a direct flight between Newark, New Jersey, and Columbia, South Carolina, where Samson has a summer home, while he was chairman and ended it days after he resigned last year. United, the dominant airline at Newark Liberty International Airport, was negotiating with the Port Authority over projects at the airport at the same time.

United also launched its own internal investigation in February. Neither of the investigations so far has raised any accounting or financial reporting concerns, said the company on Tuesday.

“We don't expect it to impact our operations,” said United’s general counsel, Brett Hart in a conference call with analysts, according to Reuters.

But news of the departures comes just after its chief financial officer left for the same role at PayPal Holdings Inc., a hint at a lack of stability that may leave investors concerned, said one expert.

“I think some investors are going to be concerned given that degree of management turnover,” said Joseph DeNardi, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus, in an interview with Reuters.

“We're really not that unstable,” Munoz said Tuesday to reporters.

Mr. Denardi said he was “surprised by” the news of Smisek’s departure. “I would imagine most people were.”

This report contains material from Reuters and the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.