US to investigate airlines for price gouging after Amtrak derailing

The Transportation Department is looking into whether Delta, American, Southwest, United, and JetBlue 'went beyond the pale' in price hikes after the tragedy, says Secretary Anthony Foxx.

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx speaks at the St. Regis Hotel on Friday in Washington, DC.

Several US airlines are being investigated for price gouging in the immediate aftermath of the deadly Amtrak derailment in Philadelphia in May, US Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx announced at a breakfast for reporters hosted by The Christian Science Monitor on Friday.

The department on Friday sent letters to Delta, American, Southwest, United, and JetBlue seeking pricing information to be provided within 30 days. The letters begin the process of uncovering whether the airlines “drove up prices in direct response to this incident and created a challenge for consumers who are trying to move in that area at that particular time,” Secretary Foxx said.

He said the airlines allegedly raised fees “beyond what you would normally expect” for the Northeast corridor. He explained that, while prices naturally respond to demand, the department is investigating whether the airlines “went beyond the pale.” 

The secretary also commented on the explosion of drone use by individuals in the United States, including a drone with a semiautomatic gun on it that was built by a Connecticut teenager. A YouTube video titled Flying Gun shows the gun-mounted drone shooting into the woods.

The Federal Aviation Administration, which is an agency within the Department of Transportation, is looking into footage of the drone, which went up on July 10. Foxx’s department, together with the FAA, are working on new regulations to integrate unmanned drones into the aviation system.

An important issue for this and other potentially dangerous consumer electronic goods – such as lasers pointed skyward that can distract pilots – is to be able to backtrack and find out who the owner is, he said.

In another example of technology outpacing consumer protections, Foxx said “car hacking” – where hackers meddle with car computers – requires a government-private sector solution. He urged the auto industry to develop a public-private sector round table to look at these and related issues. “We can’t do it by ourselves,” he said.

On Friday, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV announced a recall of 1.4 million vehicles that could be subject to hacking.

Meanwhile, as the July 31 deadline nears for the end of federal funding for highway and bridge repair, the secretary said he was “encouraged” that lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are “earnestly trying” to work out a more sustainable solution than the more than 30 short-term patches that Congress has applied to highway funding over the years. 

The House and Senate are at odds over a way to extend the funding. The House has passed a patch that goes into December, with the understanding that lawmakers will, in the meantime, work on corporate tax reform as a long-term funding solution. The Senate is still working its way through a six-year highway bill that’s only funded for three years, with revenue coming from different pots.

The White House prefers the House bill because of its intention to use corporate tax reform for funding – an idea the president supports. But as Foxx said, he’s waiting for the Senate bill to “congeal” before he weighs in on it.

If no solution is reached by the deadline, 4,000 federal employees would likely be furloughed, and transportation projects around the country be left hanging as the government begins to apportion out its $4 billion cushion. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.