Charitable giving sets new record, but why are religious donations waning?

Charitable giving in the US reached a record $358.4 billion in 2014, according to a new report. While still accounting for the largest share of donations, religious giving has slowed as fewer Americans claim religious affiliation and turn their focus to a wider variety of charitable causes. 

Aaron McKrell/The News-Dispatch/AP/File
Salvation Army Lt. Bill Brutto stacks food at the Salvation Army in Michigan City, Ind. Charitable giving in the US set a new record in 2014, but religious giving is seeing its market share fall in part because large relief organizations like the Salvation Army are counted in other categories.

It took seven years, but charitable giving in the US finally has set a new record. However, organizations that historically have accounted the bulk of such donations – churches – are losing ground as congregations shrink and givers embrace a wider variety of charitable causes.

American donors were more generous than ever in 2014, giving an estimated $358.4 billion to charity, according to an annual report released Tuesday by the Giving USA Foundation, a Chicago-area nonprofit. The 2014 total is 7.1 percent higher than 2013, and the highest total since the previous annual record set in 2007 (an estimated 355.17 billion) before the Great Recession.

Contributions rose in 8 of 9 charity categories, with only donations to international affairs declining. But the composition of those donations is changing; In particular, religious giving has been ceding ground to other categories over the past few decades, and that trend continued in 2014.

When adjusted for inflation, donations to religious organizations grew just 0.9 percent year-over year – the smallest increase among all categories.

"While the overall growth is indicative of robust philanthropy … we would be remiss to gloss over what is happening with giving to religion,” Giving USA chairman David King said in the report’s release. Religion still accounts for the largest percentage of donations, and along with six other categories, it reached a new peak in 2014 with  $114.9 billion in contributions. But religious giving “is continuing its 30-year dramatic downward slide,” Mr. King notes. “In fact, it has dropped from 53 percent of all donations in 1987 to 32 percent of the total in 2014.”

Unsurprisingly, demographics have a lot to do with religion’s shrinking piece of the charity pie. According to a recent Pew study, the number of Americans who don’t have any religious affiliation grew to about 56 million last year, a nearly 7 percent increase just since 2007. Over the same period, the share of Americans who identify as Christians, while still a vast majority, has dropped from about 78 percent of the US population in 2007 to 71 percent in 2014. The trend is even more pronounced among Millennial adults; those with no religious affiliation outnumber both mainline Protestants and Catholics in that age group.

“When we look at the religious sector, [donations] come primarily from houses of worship,” says Giving USA Foundation chairman and nonprofit consultant Keith Curtis, in a phone interview. “When people are not attending, that means they’re not giving.”

But shifts in the giving landscape itself also play a big role. For one, certain religious-oriented charitable organizations that do other types of work, like Salvation Army and Catholic Relief Services, aren’t counted as part of the ‘religion’ umbrella, but under categories like human services and international affairs, which have grown at a faster clip.

Second, as the wealthiest Americans grow even wealthier, large, individual gifts make up a growing proportion of charitable gifts. Giving USA’s report noted several gifts over $200 million over the past year, and one over $2 billion. Those gifts, Mr. Curtis notes, “have a tendency to go to education, arts and culture, health.”

Indeed, the arts, culture, and humanities category saw the biggest year-over-year increase among categories, climbing 7.4 percent when adjusted for inflation.

Religious gifts, on the other hand, tend to come from a wider cross-section of donors, including people who are still cautious about their finances. “Collection plate” donations tend to be more tied to individual income, he notes, while bigger gifts tend to be tied to assets and wealth (the latter has ballooned since the recession; the former, not so much).

Churches are trying to break out of that week-to-week rut by reaching out to donors online, holding annual pledges, and even introducing tithing via text message. And churchgoers are by no means tightening their purse strings. On the contrary, a 2013 study found that religious Americans are more likely to give than their nonreligious counterparts. It’s just that they are giving beyond the collection plate. “Americans want to help people in need and organizations that make a difference, and they may only have a certain amount of money to give to all of their causes,” Curtis says. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Charitable giving sets new record, but why are religious donations waning?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today