US poor and middle class give more to charity, but wealthy pull back

Even though middle- and lower-income Americans were earning less in 2012 than in 2006, they increased the amount they gave to charity by 4.5 percent, according to a new report from The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

Rich Miller, The Indianapolis Star/AP
Bell-ringer Craig Premo watches a passerby drop a donation in a Salvation Army pot, Nov. 27, 2002, in Fishers, Ind.

What makes Americans more likely to give to charity?

Poorer and middle-class Americans are more likely to donate than are the wealthiest people in the country, according to a report released Monday by The Chronicle of Philanthropy

Americans give an average of about 3 percent of their income to charity, according to the study. But in recent years, Americans in different income brackets have diverged on the giving scale. Between 2006 and 2012, Americans earning $200,000 or more decreased the amount they gave to charity by 4.6 percent. In that same period, Americans earning less than $100,000 increased the amount they gave by 4.5 percent. And that increase was despite the fact that middle- and lower-income Americans were earning less than they did six years earlier, the report notes. 

Using IRS information, the report looked at charitable gifts that were claimed as itemized deductions. So, is there a unifying factor for high charitable donations? According to the report, the top 17 most generous states all voted for Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election. The most generous state was Utah, which has a giving rate of about 6.6 percent. That state was followed by Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, and Georgia. 

Church attendance also factored into people's likeliness to donate, says Chronicle editor Stacy Palmer. In Utah, for example, residents donated $65.60 to charity for every $1,000 they earned. Utah has a Mormon population of 62.2 percent, according to 2012 Census data. The Mormon Church requires members to give at least 10 percent of their annual income to charity.

Low levels of charitable giving in some states – New Hampshire having the lowest rate at 1.7 percent – could be attributed to low levels of church attendance, Ms. Palmer adds. The report did not examine giving rates for religious groups other than Christian denominations.

"Religion has always played an important role in giving," she says. "People who are religious have always had a very strong tradition of charitable giving ... both to the church and to other solicitations."

She notes, however, that giving in “Bible belt” states has increased among religious as well as secular people.

Of the most generous cities, Las Vegas held the top spot, increasing its giving by 14.9 percent between 2006 and 2012, the report notes, adding that Las Vegas's growth helped propel Nevada to be the state whose rate of giving grew the most. 

A majority of the country's 50 largest cities saw declines in their giving rates. Buffalo-Niagara Falls, N.Y., had the steepest decline, with its rate going down by more than 10 percent. New York City, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and Washington also saw declines. 

While middle-class Americans are giving more, the overall amount given by wealthy Americans increased by $4.6 billion, amounting to $77.5 billion in 2012, after adjusting for inflation, the report notes.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.