Michael Jordan joins Forbes billionaires list. Who else is new?

Forbes released its 2015 list of the world's billionaires Monday, welcoming hoops legend Michael Jordan and the youngest self-made woman ever to its ranks. Who are some of other the new members of the Forbes list,  and how did they get there? 

Chuck Burton/AP/File
Charlotte Bobcats owner Michael Jordan watching during the first half of an NBA basketball game between the Bobcats and the Chicago Bulls in Charlotte, N.C. Michael Jordan and two other NBA owners have joined Forbes’ annual list of the world’s billionaires. Forbes said Monday, March 2, 2015, that Jordan’s net worth is estimated at $1 billion, thanks to his well-timed investment in the Charlotte Hornets.

Michael Jordan is arguably the greatest basketball player to lace up a pair of sneakers. Now the man who has five league MVP awards, six NBA championships, and the first NBA franchise majority-owned by an African American can add another title to his resume: billionaire. 

Mr. Jordan made his first appearance on Forbes' list of the world's billionaires for 2015 by raking in revenue from Nike payouts and the Jordan brand, but his majority stake in the Charlotte Hornets franchise put him over the top for the first time this year. 

The 29th edition of the Forbes list is the largest to date. Jordan is one of 1,826 billionaires across 70 countries, who share a combined net worth of $7.05 trillion. That's a huge jump from the  $6.4 trillion combined net worth of last year's list, according to Forbes. Microsoft Founder Bill Gates finished on top of the list for the 16th time in the last 21 years, and Jordan came in at number 1,741.

With the bottom falling out of the world oil market and a sluggish global economy overall, one might think 2014 would have been a down year for the world's wealthiest entrepreneurs and capitalists.

Not so. A record 290 people joined the list this year. The average net worth of this exclusive club is $3.86 billion, which is actually down $60 million from 2014.

Entrepreneurs dominated the list: 1,191 self-made individuals are in the billionaires' club, compared with the 635 who fully or partially inherited their wealth, according to the report. 

And they're getting younger. A record 46 of this year's billionaires are under the age of 40, ,the youngest being 24-year-old Snapchat co-founder Evan Spiegel. Mr. Spiegel famously turned down both a $3 billion and $4 billion offer from Facebook and Google, respectively, to buy his mobile application.

Snapchat has over 100 million users, according to the Wall Street Journal. The app recently jumped into the news business with its Discover service, where various news outlets provide content for users. Back in mid-February, Snapchat reportedly sought a $19 billion valuation, according to Bloomberg.

At age 31, Elizabeth Holmes, who is the founder of the medical testing firm Theranos, is the youngest self-made woman on the list. Through her health technology company Theranos, Ms. Holmes developed a hand-held device that conducts over 200 medical tests at a fraction of the cost of traditional testing systems. 

Forbes compiles its annual list through analyzing net worths; values of individuals’ assets, which include stakes in public and private companies; real estate; yachts; art; and cash, which they attempt to balance with estimated debt levels. Forbes tries to confirm their calculations with the members of the list, it says, but the degree of cooperation and disclosure varies from person to person. Forbes says it  does not count foreign heads of state for this billionaire list who have amassed their wealth through their political power and embezzling national funds, because this does not reflect individual or entrepreneurial wealth. 

As in past years, the Forbes list highlights the ever-increasing concentration of wealth by a handful of people. Oxfam estimated that the richest one percent in the world will own more wealth than the other 99 percent by as early as next year. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.