Can you get sued for leaving a bad review on Trip Advisor or Yelp?

The Broadway Hotel in Blackpool, England, charged one couple an extra £100 ($156) after they left a negative review of the hotel on TripAdvisor. Hotel Quebec sued a guest for $95,000 after a bad review. Is this legal? 

TripAdvisor screenshot

For more than a decade, disgruntled customers have been unleashing their frustration over bad customer experiences on review sites like TripAdvisor and Yelp, often damaging a restaurant or hotel's business in the process.

Now, businesses are fighting back.

Like the Broadway Hotel in Blackpool, England, which charged one couple an extra £100 ($156) after they left a negative review of the hotel on TripAdvisor, calling it a “filthy, dirty rotten stinking hovel." (After the couple complained to authorities, their fine will be refunded, according to reports.)

And Hotel Quebec, which sued a guest for $95,000 after he wrote a review on TripAdvisor saying he was bitten by bed bugs there.

And Dietz Development LLC, a Fairfax, Va.-based contractor owned by Christopher Dietz, who sued a negative Yelp reviewer for $750,000 in a defamation suit.

"Businesses that generate income from Yelp and TripAdvisor will be more and more aggressive about how they protect themselves," James Hunt, an attorney with Slater, Tenaglia, Fritz & Hunt in New York, told Main Street earlier this year.

"The rapid growth of online reviews has certainly led to an increase in lawsuits against reviewers," added Josh King, general counsel for legal marketplace, which features reviews of attorneys by clients.

That's because sites like TripAdvisor and Yelp are increasingly important to the business of many establishments like hotels and restaurants. TripAdvisor (and its 24 subsidiary sites) get 315 million visitors per month, and the company has more than 190 million reviews covering more than 4.4 million accommodations, restaurants, and attractions, according to the company's website

Yelp is also a hugely popular review site, with 139 million monthly visitors and 33 million reviews written each month. 

Several studies have underscored the importance of review sites to the businesses they review. One study showed that a one star increase in rating on Yelp yields a 5-9 percent increase in revenue for a company. In other words, positive reviews are important to a company's reputation and success - and negative reviews can be very damaging.

Damaging enough that businesses are beginning to target the people behind the negative reviews – not companies like Yelp or TripAdvisor, which have significant legal protections, but the actual posters of wrote the review, average folks writing about a bad experience at a hotel or restaurant.

So can you get sued for leaving a bad review on Yelp or TripAdvisor?

As previous examples have shown, yes.

What about free speech?

Freedom of speech under the US Constitution, courts have ruled, doesn't extend to defamation – statements that are damaging to a person or business's good reputation. Generally speaking, a defamatory statement must be false for the reviewer to be held liable.

That said, there are ways for reviewers to continue to write reviews, even negative ones, and not get sued (depending on the laws of the country where the case is brought, since libel laws vary significantly between the US and other countries). 

For starters, truth is generally a good defense, so would-be reviewers are encouraged not to lie or exaggerate their negative experience. But reviewers may have to prove their complaint is true – that there were, in fact, cockroaches in the hotel room, or hair in the bathtub, and present evidence as proof. 

In such cases, there's often safety in numbers. Even better than truth is when "five or ten other posters share similar feelings," said Hunt.

That said, as Andrew Couts at Digital Trends notes, reviews are one of the only forums in which opinions and emotions are, from a legal standpoint, better than fact, at least in the US. That's because opinions, under the free-speech amendment, tend to be protected by the US Constitution. So it's safer to say, "In my opinion, I was served bread that tasted stale," than "The restaurant serves old, moldy, stale bread."

Similarly, if an experience left you angry, it's better to write, "The entire experience left me very uncomfortable," than it is to launch accusations at the proprietors with whom you dealt.

In a court of law, emotions and opinions are more easily protected than statements of fact, which may be disputed or difficult to prove.

Digital Trends also offered this advice to would-be reviewers: "If you have a negative experience with a business, keep the facts simple and straightforward, and don’t exaggerate...[and] feel free to give a scathing opinion to avoid fudging the objective facts in a potentially slanderous way."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Can you get sued for leaving a bad review on Trip Advisor or Yelp?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today