Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) splits. Will it make HP a tech leader again?

Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) announced Monday that the company will split into Hewlett-Packard Enterprise and HP Inc. According to HP, the split will allow the two companies to focus on more specific parts of the technology industry. 

LM Otero/AP/File
Hewlett Packard logo in Frisco, Texas on Feb. 21, 2012. Hewlett-Packard on Monday, Oct. 6, said it is splitting itself into two companies, one focused on its personal computer and printing business and another on technology services, such as data storage, servers and software, as it aims to drive profits higher.

Hewlett-Packard is trying to regain its foothold as a leader in the tech world by splitting into two different companies: HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.

In an announcement Monday, HP said it would create two companies that will each focus on specific parts of the technology industry. Hewlett-Packard Enterprise will concentrate on data storage, servers, and cloud computing, while HP Inc. will continue focusing on personal systems, printing, and 3D printing. The deal is still waiting final approval from the board of directors and is expected to close by the end of the 2015 fiscal year. As part of its turnaround, the company will also eliminate approximately 5,000 additional jobs. 

Hewlett-Packard has had a hard time keeping up with the changing pace of personal computing, so it created a five-year  plan to revamp the company back in 2011. The company split comes at the end of the third year of a five-year strategy for HP, and it's been a good one. HP’s stock has risen more than 32 percent year-to-date, and that  growing strength has made the split possible, according to executives. On their own, each company is in the top half of the Fortune 500 list.

“Our work during the past three years has significantly strengthened our core businesses to the point where we can more aggressively go after the opportunities created by a rapidly changing market,” Meg Whitman, president and chief executive officer of HP, said in a statement. “The decision to separate into two market-leading companies underscores our commitment to the turnaround plan…. In short, by transitioning now from one HP to two new companies, created out of our successful turnaround efforts, we will be in an even better position to compete in the market, support our customers and partners, and deliver maximum value to our shareholders.”

HP was once the giant of computers, but with the growth of Apple, Google, and IBM, the company has faced a lot of turmoil. Investors and analysts have been calling for HP to split to allow the companies to focus more on profitable operations. But Ms. Whitman, who became CEO in 2011, resisted. But in the announcement Monday, Whitman said the split allows the two companies to have more “independence, focus, financial resources, and flexibility they need to adapt quickly to market and customer dynamics, while generating long-term value for shareholders.”

Whitman will continue with the company as the CEO of Hewlett-Packard Enterprise and as nonexecutive chairman of HP Inc. Dion Weisler will move from head of HP’s printing business to CEO of HP Inc. 

“HP’s board and management have made a brilliant value-enhancing move at the perfect time in the turnaround,” Ralph V. Whitworth, founder of Relational Investors and a former chairman of HP’s board, said in a statement on Monday. “The new companies will be better positioned to address today’s light-speed market dynamics and customer needs, and with distinct and compelling financial profiles and strong leadership teams, accelerate growth and shareholder value creation.” 

After the deal is closed, stockowners will own a stake in both new businesses through a tax-free transaction.  

“Shareholders will now be able to invest in the respective asset groups without the fear of cross-subsidies and inefficiencies that invariably plague large business conglomerates," Mr. Whitworth said. 

HP currently has 300,000 employees and made $112 billion last year. By noon Monday, stocks of HP were up 5.09  percent to nearly $37 per share. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.