Texans RB Foster becomes an IPO. More to follow on the 'jock exchange'?

Houston Texans running back Arian Foster recently launched an IPO, handing off a percentage of his future earnings from what he does both on and off the field to investors. But with their short, volatile careers, are football players really the best investments?

Jay Biggerstaff/AP/TUSP/File
Houston Texans running back Arian Foster (23) stretches before an NFL game against the Kansas City Chiefs at Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City, Mo. last month. Foster recently launched an IPO, giving investors a cut of his future earnings.

Last month, Houston Texans running back Arian Foster announced that he would kick off the first initial public offering on the Fantex athlete stock exchange. In return for the lion's share of the money raised through the IPO, Mr. Foster will hand over a percentage of his future earnings from what he does both on and off the field.

The company behind this idea, Fantex Brokerage Services, hopes to launch the largest offering of celebrity stocks in history. With a second athlete, San Francisco 49ers tight end Vernon Davis, already on board, Fantex chief executive Buck French imagines a bustling stock exchange where fans and investors can trade on the value of personal brands.

"Our goal is to have athlete brands in all major sports, and globally as well," he says.

When the Foster stock officially goes on sale in a few weeks, the Pro Bowl star will receive $10 million from the IPO. In exchange for that lump sum, Foster will pay Fantex 20 percent of his future earnings, including football contracts, endorsement deals, and appearance fees. Fantex says 95 percent of that money will go into a "tracking stock" for investors, with the remainder lining its own pockets.

As with other tracking stocks, investors will not have any ownership over the actual brand. Foster may lead his professional life in whatever direction he sees fit.

If the 27-year-old has a long career in designer-watch ads and ESPN spots, investors could turn a nice profit. If he's on the far end of his career, however, the IPO will be little more than a novel stimulus package for Foster.

"I think it's pretty dubious," says Craig Pirrong, a finance professor at the University of Houston. "The sport in which [Fantex's plan] is least likely to work out is football, at least from an investor's perspective."

Foster, to boot, is out for the remainder of the NFL season with an injury. 

Football is a high-risk sport

Among major sports, football has the highest risk of career-ending injuries, Mr. Pirrong explains. Players in the National Football League last, on average, six years. Foster is already in his fifth. And with his current salary of about $6.7 million, Foster will need to rack up some hefty endorsement deals before he'll earn the $50 million needed for investors to simply break even.

"If it's priced properly, such a stock could still make a lot of sense," he says, "but it seems to me that the price they're asking [for Foster] is very rich."

Mr. French acknowledges that these tracking stocks are highly speculative. In prospectus submitted to federal regulators for the Foster deal, Fantex says that it has never tried this before and thus the risks are unknown.

The exact terms of each stock could differ greatly, as Fantex tries to balance an athlete's history, his or her public persona, the risks of a given sport, and what the celebrity wants out of the deal. For example, Mr. Davis will receive $4 million for 10 percent of his future income.

Foster and Davis are not the only stars to emulate Wall Street. In 1997, musician David Bowie issued what many consider to be the first celebrity stock. These so-called Bowie Bonds paid out based on royalties collected from the 25 albums he released before 1990. Mr. Bowie then borrowed $55 million against this promised income. According to Fortune, Bowie paid back his investors, with 7.9 percent interest, over about 10 years, although official details were never released.

Investment banker David Pullman, the mastermind behind Bowie Bonds, set up similar securities for several songwriters, including Jake Hooker, who co-wrote Joan Jett's "I Love Rock 'n' Roll," and Duane Hitchings, who co-wrote Ron Stewart's "Young Turks."

But celebrity stocks nearly disappeared after the late 1990s. In 2004, as the music industry struggled with piracy, even successful securities, like Bowie Bonds, were rated at near-junk status. Last year, with the rise of Apple's iTunes and other legal music marketplaces, Goldman Sachs attempted to issue a bond tied to song royalties from Bob Dylan and Neil Diamond. Investors didn't bite.

Creating higher owner advocacy

In 2008, minor-league baseball player Randy Newsom tried to sell stocks based on future earnings if he made it to the big leagues. He scuttled the plan after taking heat from both the US Securities and Exchange Commission and Major League Baseball.

Now, with the popularity of fantasy sports teams, Fantex wants to increase fan investment – literally. By letting people buy into an athlete's future success, French says fans will have an interest in keeping even retired stars in the public eye.

"We feel that if you actually create an ownership interest that's linked to the value performance of the brand and you get it in the hands of the public, with social media today, you can create a level of owner advocacy that you otherwise wouldn't have," he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Texans RB Foster becomes an IPO. More to follow on the 'jock exchange'?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today