Jaguars release new uniforms: best and worst new designs in the NFL (+video)

Change is in the sartorial NFL air. Since the league made the switch from Reebok to Nike as its uniform supplier last year, four teams have dramatically overhauled their looks – with mixed results.The Jacksonville Jaguars' new uniforms were released Tuesday, and the Vikings and Dolphins unveiled theirs Thursday. Here are the new threads, presented in a highly subjective ranking from least to most successful. Franchises will be loosely judged on logo, color incorporation, risk-taking, and the level to which the uniforms were actually “overhauled” at all. (Call it “effort”). 

4. Miami Dolphins

Lynne Sladky/AP
Miami Dolphins quarterback Ryan Tannehill (17) waves as the Miami Dolphins unveil their new uniforms during an NFL football draft party, Thursday, April 25, 2013 in Miami. Also shown are former Miami Dolphins quarterbacks Bob Griese (12) and Dan Marino (13).

Unlike, say, the Jacksonville Jaguars' new uniforms, the 'Fins look wasn't changed much. But that didn't prevent a huge misstep: getting rid of one of the league's best logos. The old logo, of a peevish cartoon dolphin wearing a football helmet, was perfectly fun and on message: it said, "We are the Dolphins, we play tough football, and you will have a blast watching us." 

The new logo says, "We saw some tasteful dolphin-print wallpaper in our dentist's waiting room and thought it would look nice on our helmets." 

The Dolphins’ brass claims the new logo is better representative of a dolphin in the wild than the old one. 

Otherwise, the new uniforms are just a slight update of the old ones: the aqua and white color scheme remains intact, and orange, which was the Dolphins’ dominant color a few decades ago, is further de-emphasized. They aren't ugly; the colors go well together and are a good visual representation of South Florida. But there's no menacing edge to these uniforms. A print dress or a room done in Miami Dolphins colors would be perfectly tasteful, and that probably isn't a good sign. 

The redesigns are part of a five-year licensing deal with Nike, launched in April of last year. Before that, the NFL contract had been held by the Adidas-owned Reebok brand for the better part of a decade. During the launch last year, some estimated that the new deal would bring about $500 million in extra revenue to the league .

The NFL hasn’t revealed exactly how much it made in merchandise sales in 2012, but the league isn’t wanting for cash flow. The NFL made $9.5 billion last year, by far the most of any US sports league. (Major League Baseball came in second, with $7.5 billion).

Like most sports leagues, the bulk of the NFL’s money comes from TV contracts, but the merchandising doesn’t hurt. Last year, the San Francisco 49ers sold the most team gear. Then-rookie Washington Redskins quarterback Robert Griffin III had the best-selling individual jersey, and broke the record for most jerseys sold in a single season.

1 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.