Bill O'Reilly's 'Killing Patton' claims that the general was killed on Stalin's orders

O'Reilly's book 'Killing Patton' hits bookstores today.

'Killing Patton' is by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard.

Bill O’Reilly’s latest book in his series about the deaths of historical figures, “Killing Patton,” hits bookstores today and puts forth the theory that the World War II general was murdered on Joseph Stalin’s orders.

In an interview with USA Today, O’Reilly, who also co-wrote “Killing Kennedy,” “Killing Lincoln,” and “Killing Jesus” with writer Martin Dugard, pointed to a car crash that left Patton paralyzed. It occurred in Germany in 1945 when his vehicle hit a US Army truck after the truck came into his path. He died less than two weeks later.

“We believe he was poisoned in the hospital” by Russian forces, O’Reilly told USA Today, because Patton was speaking out against them.

“His final moments can’t be examined or explained,” O’Reilly told the New York Post’s Page Six. “I’m not conspiratorial, but documents surrounding it have disappeared. I hope the Army or Pentagon reopen the case.”

As for the titles of the books in his series, O’Reilly told USA Today, “I'm a snappy guy. I do things in a flamboyant way. I want to get your attention.” 

He said the book doesn’t only center on the World War II general of the title but examines the conflict as a whole.

“Wartime things exist of which we have no idea,” O’Reilly said in an interview with Page Six. “Our side wasn’t all good. Eisenhower and Patton, who had mistresses, were glory seekers, not buddies. In this book, they’re human beings.”

Here's a sample of the "Patton" audiobook.

O’Reilly and Dugard’s last few books have been bestsellers. The previous title, “Killing Jesus,” occupying the first, second, and third spots on the IndieBound hardcover nonfiction bestseller list for multiple weeks after its release last September.

But if O'Reilly's books have been popular, they have not been free of controversy. “Killing Lincoln” sparked debate after its publication in 2011 when some readers complained of what they said were errors in the book. The staff at Ford’s Theatre made headlines when they refused to stock the book in the theater’s gift shop because of claims that it was inaccurate.

“If the authors made mistakes in names, places, and events, what else did they get wrong? How can the reader rely on anything that appears in ‘Killing Lincoln’?” historian Edward Steers Jr. wrote in a review of the book that appeared in the magazine North and South – The Official Magazine of the Civil War Society.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Bill O'Reilly's 'Killing Patton' claims that the general was killed on Stalin's orders
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today