'The Giver': How will the movie adaptation be different from the book?

Actor Jeff Bridges, who is starring in the film, cautioned that the movie is 'taking a lot of licenses.'

Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
Jeff Bridges is starring in the film adaptation of 'The Giver.'

Actor Jeff Bridges, who is starring in the film adaptation of Lois Lowry’s novel “The Giver,” recently gave some insight into exactly how the movie will be different from Lowry’s work.

Bridges is playing the title role in the film and “Maleficent” actor Brenton Thwaites is playing Jonas, the young adult who is sent to study under the Giver, while Meryl Streep is portraying the community’s Chief Elder and singer Taylor Swift, who has previously acted in “Valentine’s Day” and supplied voice work for the movie “The Lorax,” is playing Rosemary, a young girl living in the same community as Jonas.

Some fans had already expressed displeasure over the decision to make Jonas older in the film than he is in the novel. According to Bridges, Jonas is now 16 rather than 12, a decision the actor said “I originally kind of balked at” in an interview with Entertainment Weekly.

What else will be different about the film? Bridges cautioned fans who want a word-for-word adaptation of Lowry’s work.

“The movie will not be an exact duplication of the book,” he said. “It’s taking a lot of licenses.”

Streep’s character will play more of a part in the story than the Chief Elder does in the novel, said Bridges, and director Phillip Noyce said there’s more romance.

“In the book, the younger pubescent Jonas has a flirtation with a young girl of his age,” he told EW. “That’s almost a love affair in the film.”

Bridges reassured readers that Lowry worked with the film’s crew to make sure aspects were as she pictured them.

“I was happy to hear from Lois that she wasn’t so concerned about all the facts being the same as in the book,” he said. “The spirit of the story is there.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.