'August: Osage County': The film's dysfunctional family is over-the-top

'August' stars Meryl Streep and Julia Roberts.

Claire Folger/The Weinstein Company/AP
'August: Osage County' stars Julianne Nicholson (l.), Meryl Streep (center), and Margo Martindale (r.).

Tracy Letts’ prizewinning play “August: Osage County," directed by John Wells and adapted by the playwright, has been turned into an all-star extravaganza, though at a markedly shorter length and with an unnecessary tacked-on (sort of) happy ending. Meryl Streep’s wily, shrewish Violet Weston, afflicted with jaw cancer, is gathered in her crumbling Oklahama mansion with her three daughters and assorted kinfolk for supper following the burial of her alcoholic poet husband (played by Sam Shepard in a cameo). The results are like a mash-up of plays by, among others, Tennessee Williams, William Inge, Carson McCullers, Lillian Hellman and, well, Sam Shepard. It has some vitality, but I’ve rarely seen a movie with this much dysfunctional family overload. 

Streep’s performance has been criticized for being too theatrical, but that’s off the mark: The character she’s playing is supposed to be theatrical. She’s a woman playing a part – the ravaged matriarch. Also on board is Julia Roberts in one of her better “serious” performances as Violet’s brutally straight-talking eldest daughter; Margo Martindale, always wonderful, as Violet’s younger sister Mattie Fae; and Chris Cooper as Mattie Fae's husband, a man who suffers and suffers. 

Benedict Cumberbach is miscast as their son, with a Southern accent that wobbles in and out. He and James Franco seem to be vying with each other for most performances by an actor in 2013. Grade: B (Rated R for language including sexual references, and for drug material.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.