'Wuthering Heights' film is first to cast black Heathcliff

The latest film adaptation of 'Wuthering Heights,' which is coming to the US in October, has received mixed reviews in the UK.

Emily Brontë classic 'Wuthering Heights' has been adapted into film before – Ralph Fiennes and Laurence Olivier have both played Heathcliff – but this will be the first time that a black actor (James Howson) has played the brooding protagonist.

A new film version of Emily Brontë classic “Wuthering Heights,” which was released this past fall in the United Kingdom, will hit US theaters Oct. 2.

 “Skins” actress Kaya Scodelario stars as Catherine Earnshaw, while actor James Howson plays Heathcliff, the first time a black actor has played the brooding hero.

“For me, it was quite clear in the book that he was dark skinned,” director Andrea Arnold told Film4. “He gets called a little Lascar, which would have been an Indian seaman, and Nelly says, ‘Who knows but your father was Emperor of China, and your mother an Indian queen’… I think his difference was certainly very important in my story and very important in the book.”

The movie’s trailer is atmospheric, with many shots of the moors and only glimpses into the story. It shows the young actors who play Catherine and Heathcliff, Shannon Beer and Solomon Glave, playing; Glave being beaten; and Howson as Heathcliff returning to the area and meeting Catherine as an adult.

“Wuthering Heights” has a 79 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and many reviewers noted how different the movie was from a usual costume drama. Some approved of this deviation, while others did not. Time reviewer Mary Corliss called the adaptation “faithful and bold” and said that casting a black actor in the role of Heathcliff was the project’s main strength.

For some critics, however, the dynamics between the leading couple were a problem. “What I found more of a problem was the faint stiffness and self-consciousness of the acting and the crucial lack of chemistry between the adult Heathcliff and Cathy,” Guardian reviewer Xan Brooks wrote. “We need to believe in this love in order for Arnold's gloriously bruised and brooding vision to properly hit home and I never did, quite.”

Telegraph reviewer Robbie Collin said he “loved it” and that “Andrea Arnold’s film certainly boasts the bonnets, romance, shots of the English countryside and 19th-century source material that are the form’s hallmarks; but it’s also strange, profane.”

However, Daily Mail critic Chris Tookey said that Brontë wouldn’t have intended her protagonist Heathcliff to be black and that because this decision made the story about race, not class, the story isn’t what the author would have wanted.

“Along with believability, period accuracy and faithfulness to the novel, Arnold sacrifices clarity. The performances are poor and opaque, so it’s hard to know what, or whether, anyone is thinking,” he wrote.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.