Simon & Schuster
"The Triumph of Nancy Reagan" by Karen Tumulty, Simon & Schuster, 662 pps.

Nancy Reagan ‘played the bad guy’ so the president could shine

A new biography portrays Nancy Reagan as tougher and more politically astute than the president, and also deeply committed to his success. 

Ronald Reagan has been credited with the ability to read a room instantly and take control of strategic moments with a disarming anecdote. Through his two terms as governor of California and two terms as president of the United States, Reagan generated speculation about the level of political savvy he hid underneath an exterior of Hollywood charm.

In Washington Post columnist Karen Tumulty’s big new book, “The Triumph of Nancy Reagan,” an answer to that speculation emerges: The president’s political savvy wasn’t hiding under his affability – it was sitting right behind him, wearing a thin smile and a crisp red Adolfo suit. 

Even Reagan’s first chief of staff, James Baker III, is quoted as saying, “She had a terrific political antenna, much better than his, in my view.” 

Tumulty seems aware of the uphill battle involved in writing a thoroughly researched and historically responsible biographical reassessment of a controversial figure like the first lady, who in her lifetime was lampooned as a brittle control freak and as a clueless campaigner for “Just Say No,” her program to discourage drug use. That lampooning was codified in Kitty Kelley’s bestselling 1991 book, “Nancy Reagan: The Unauthorized Biography.” In this newest book, Tumulty has created the best possible rejoinder: She’s written a masterpiece.

Tumulty is well aware of her subject’s shortcomings. “Her purchase of more than $200,000 worth of White House china created a headache for her husband amid a recession during which the Reagan administration was cutting poverty programs,” Tumulty writes. “She ‘borrowed’ designer clothes and did not give them back.” 

A subtly different version of the administration emerges from Tumulty’s book. At one point, Reagan confided to his future biographer Edmund Morris that the year 1949 had been the lowest of his life: He was unhappily divorced, he had an injured leg and was hobbling around on crutches, and his movie career was dying. “And then along came Nancy Davis,” he tells Morris, “and saved my soul.”

Nancy was born Anne Frances Robbins in 1921 and became Nancy Davis when she was adopted by her mother’s second husband. After a stint acting in Hollywood, she married Ronald Reagan in 1952 and became famously devoted to him. “She had but one preoccupation,” Tumulty writes, “Ronald Reagan’s well-being and success.”

Early in Reagan’s political life, his agent accurately described him as “allergic to interpersonal conflict,” warning that, in any political career, “You’re going to have to fire a lot of people.” It became clear that Reagan, with his easygoing nature, would be a disaster at this kind of thing; that would be his wife’s job. “She was the one that was going to be the bad guy.” 

That was certainly her reputation during Reagan’s time in office. As Tumulty notes, although the first lady seldom set foot in the West Wing, her presence there was palpable. 

In “The Triumph of Nancy Reagan,” that palpable presence is still there. But Tumulty, who interviewed a legion of sources, presents a picture of the first lady as surprisingly earthy, an avid listener, and consistently, stealthily, kind.

“Mrs. Reagan wants it that way” is the unacknowledged theme of the book. Tumulty’s organizing claim is that the first lady was a central player in one of the most pivotal American presidencies of the 20th century, and that case has never been more strongly made. 

All future biographies of her will have to start with this one; it deserves a place on the same shelf with Margery M. Heffron’s “Louisa Catherine: The Other Mrs. Adams” and Blanche Wiesen Cook’s three-volume biography of Eleanor Roosevelt.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Nancy Reagan ‘played the bad guy’ so the president could shine
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2021/0512/Nancy-Reagan-played-the-bad-guy-so-the-president-could-shine
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe