'On Tyranny' suggests many simple actions can foster civil society

The book is an expansion of a popular Facebook post on defending democracy that author and Yale historian Timothy Snyder wrote following the US election.

On Tyranny By Timothy Snyder Crown/Archetype 128 pp.

Shortly after the November, 2016, election of Donald Trump to the US presidency, books like George Orwell classic "1984" and Sinclair Lewis's eerie "It Can't Happen Here" shot to the top of bookseller lists across the country. Unsettled by what they saw as an unconventional government with unconventional policies, some readers turned to writers like Orwell in order to stay alert to any possible erosion of democracy. A newer title that these same readers might want to add to their reading lists is Yale University historian Timothy Snyder’s On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. Though slim enough to fit in your pocket, this bestseller repeatedly drives home a sobering thesis: “Americans today are no wiser than the Europeans who saw democracy yield to fascism, Nazism or communism in the twentieth century.”

“On Tyranny” is an expansion of a popular Facebook post on defending democracy that Snyder wrote following the US election. The less-than-130-page book comprises 20 “lessons,” each with a title as concise as it is thought-provoking: “Do not obey in advance,” “Be kind to your language,” “Establish a private life.” Snyder, an award-winning author of books on mass murders committed by the Nazi and Soviet governments, illustrates his lessons with examples from the two regimes, examples that open our eyes to our misplaced complacency in our current society.

“We might be tempted to think that our democratic heritage protects us from [fascism and communism],” Snyder writes. “This is a misguided reflex.” He cites a 1933 editorial from a major German Jewish newspaper: The article asserts that Hitler would neither strip German Jews of constitutional rights, nor create ghettos, nor unleash violent mobs, because “a number of crucial factors hold power in check.” Such ideas were considered reasonable in 1933, as they are today, Snyder writes. His “lesson”? “Institutions do not protect themselves. They fall one after the other unless each is defended from the beginning. So choose an institution you care about – a court, a newspaper, a law, a labor union – and take its side.”

Snyder never mentions President Trump by name (referring instead to 'the president"). He points out what he sees as dangerous resemblances between our current society and those that gave birth to tyranny. “Both fascism and communism were responses to globalization: to the real and perceived inequalities it created,” he reminds us. He notes that terrorist attacks were ideal opportunities for would-be tyrants to snatch away citizens’ rights. His example is the Reichstag fire, when the German parliament building burned down one night in February 1933. The next day, Hitler, who had been elected chancellor of Germany, initiated a state of emergency, ordering that citizens could be “preventively detained.” Soon afterwards, he began sending political rivals to “improvised concentration camps.”

In one of the more controversial sections of "On Tyranny," Snyder draws on the theories of Romance languages scholar Victor Klemperer to note what he sees as similarities between the language of "the president" and that of Hitler – a comparison that some critics have decried as exaggerated. In the lesson “Be kind to your language,” Snyder writes: “The people [in Hitler’s discourse] always means some people but not others (the president uses it the same way) encounters were always struggles (the president says winning), or any attempt by free people to understand the world in a different way was defamation of the leader (or, as the president puts it, libel).”

But Snyder does not confine his criticism to Trump. He also identifies flaws in the language of certain news outlets: “When we repeat the same words and phrases that appear in the daily media, we accept the absence of a larger network.” The “lesson” he draws from this is good for voters of all persuasions: Turn off your screens for a while. Read and try to express your ideas with your own words.

“On Tyranny” suggests many such simple actions that foster civil society. Smiling or greeting people around you could mean a lot, Snyder writes, because people persecuted under Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini all remembered how their neighbors treated them. In fact, any shared activity or undertaking, even if not at all political, can be good for freedom in society, he writes, citing Czech writer Václav Havel. “Sharing in an undertaking teaches us that we can trust people beyond a narrow circle of friends and families, and helps us to recognize authorities from whom we can learn. [This] can make life seem less chaotic and mysterious, and democratic politics more plausible and attractive.”

And should oppression one day arrive, Snyder advises us to stay calm and “stand out.” Snyder’s rich text, which deserves multiple readings, could anchor us in such moments. “The moment you set an example," he writes, "the spell of the status quo is broken, and others will follow.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'On Tyranny' suggests many simple actions can foster civil society
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today