Wealth and Power

Why has China lagged behind the West in terms of wealth and power? Chinese leaders, writers, and activists offer their explanations.

Wealth and Power By Orville Schell and John Delury Random House 496 pp.

Ask an American about the Opium Wars and you’ll likely get a blank stare. Ask a Chinese citizen, however, and you’ll hear a detailed account of how Western powers humiliated China in the mid-19th century, forced opium on its people, and grabbed Chinese territory.

In Wealth and Power: China's Long March to the Twenty-first Century, Orville Schell and John Delury explain how, for more than a century and a half, Chinese leaders, writers, and activists have sought answers as to why China lags behind Western countries in wealth and power.

The authors go into great detail on the lives and philosophies of 11 prominent Chinese who represent a range of ideological beliefs, such as Nationalist Chiang Kai-shek, Communist Mao Zedong, reformist Deng Xiaoping, and modern-day dissidents. Despite their differences, the authors argue, all were obsessed with how to raise China’s status.

The book’s title is derived from a statement made by a Chinese philosopher more than 2,000 years ago: “If a wise ruler masters wealth and power, he can have whatever he desires.”

Schell has been writing about China as an academic and a journalist since the 1960s and first visited that country in 1974, during the Mao Zedong era. He is now Director of the Center on U.S.-China Relations at the Asia Society in New York. John Delury is a senior fellow of the Center on U.S.-China Relations.

Despite the tremendous economic progress it has made in recent years, China seems to dwell on its victimhood, the book notes, even holding a National Day of Humiliation to remind citizens of the low points.

Critics contend that the emphasis on blaming foreigners for China’s past problems helps legitimize the Communist Party while downplaying the disasters of the Mao era.

One such disastrous campaign, the Great Leap Forward of 1958-60, resulted in at least 30 million deaths, as Mao implemented irrational policies he said would help China overtake Britain in steel production in 15 years.

“Such extravagant aspirations were expressions of a long-frustrated dream, one to which generations of Chinese reformers eager to catch up with the West had clung,” Schell and Delury write.

After Mao’s death, Deng Xiaoping broke China free from Mao’s rigid ideology by saying, “It doesn't matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice.” Variations of that theme have been presented by Chinese reformers since the mid-1800s, as they wrestled with how to take the best ideas from the West without abandoning Chinese culture.

Deng’s trip to a Texas rodeo in 1979, in which he delighted the crowd by wearing a cowboy hat, signaled that “Deng’s new wild-west rodeo was launched,” the authors write.

But, although Deng took a dramatically different approach than Mao, “his goal was exactly the same: wealth, power and prestige for his nation,” the book contends. The authors note that, although Deng allowed far more freedom than Mao, he ordered deadly force in 1989 when he felt the Tiananmen Square protests had gone too far.

Seventy years earlier, Chinese students had rallied in the May Fourth movement, raising some of the same issues that gained international attention in 1989. The 1919 campaign was “a moment of popular protest from which almost all future Chinese political movements derived political inspiration,” the authors explain.

Many influential Chinese in the past century and a half have argued that China is not ready for democracy. There are those who strongly disagree with that statement, including the imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo.

Casual readers may find that this book reads too much like a textbook with more details than they would want to know about some of the earlier historical figures, as well as frequent use of Chinese characters and transliterations of key slogans. Many phrases that could have been written in everyday language are not, such as “volte-face” for “about face.”

Surprisingly, only brief mention is given to the 1937 “Rape of Nanking,” the wartime atrocity that influences today’s Chinese view of Japan as much as the Opium Wars color Chinese attitudes toward the West.

But, overall, this book will play an important role in explaining why it is essential to know China’s modern history in order to understand what’s going on in China today and how Chinese view the world.

Mike Revzin, a journalist who worked in China, helps Americans learn about China with his ChinaSeminars.com programs.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Wealth and Power
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today