8 new baseball books for Opening Day

Here are excerpts from eight new titles on baseball.

4. ‘The Immaculate Inning: Unassisted Triple Plays, 40/40 Seasons, and the Stories Behind Baseball's Rarest Feats,’ by Joe Cox

The world of baseball statistics is explored in a decidedly fun way in “The Immaculate Inning.” It takes a refreshing, big-picture view of some of the most unusual feats in the game. Baseball researcher Joe Cox devotes each of 30 chapters to one rare feat, such as pitchers who have struck out four batters in a single inning. That’s been accomplished 87 times between 1885 and its most recent occurrence in 2017. As you might imagine, there are numerous revelations and surprises along way. For example, seven players have stolen six bases in a single game, but none of them were noted base thieves Rickey Henderson, Lou Brock, or Vince Coleman. The last player to join this exclusive fraternity was Tampa Bay’s Carl Crawford in 2009.

Here’s an excerpt from The Immaculate Inning:

“It sounds like some sort of bizarre science-fiction fantasy. How do you strike out four batters in an inning? The answer lies in Rule 5.05(a)(2), which provides that if a third strike is not caught, and first base is either unoccupied, or is occupied with two out, then the batter can run for first base. If that discussion doesn’t work, ask any surviving Brooklyn Dodger fan about Mickey Owen, and be regaled with the story of his dropping a third strike in the 1941 World Series. With a dropped (or just plain missed) third strike from a catcher, a fourth strikeout is now possible. Even a fifth is possible, although that hasn’t happened yet.

“So what kind of pitcher gets four strikeouts in an inning? Many, many different kinds, but the common thread is having good enough stuff to strike out four batters – and to elude his own catcher on a strikeout. Beyond that, every one of the 87 four-strikeout innings has its own peculiar story.”

4 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.