8 new baseball books for Opening Day

Here are excerpts from eight new titles on baseball.

3. ‘The Baby Bombers: The Inside Story of the Next Yankees Dynasty,’ by Bryan Hoch

In 2015, the New York Yankees had only one player in the starting lineup under the age of 30 (shortstop Didi Gregorius). Now, however, their lineup card boasts some of the best young talent in the majors, including 6 ft. 7in. slugger Aaron Judge, who enjoyed a Ruthian year in 2017 with 52 home runs. This core of rising stars, whom author Bryan Hoch dubs the “Baby Bombers” (Judge, catcher Gary Sanchez, pitcher Luis Severino, and first baseman Greg Bird), has Yankee fans seriously dreaming about multiple championships. After all, the team barely missed out on playing in last year’s World Series, falling one win shy, and now, in addition to the quartet of Baby Bombers developed in the team’s farm system, the team has also signed Giancarlo Stanton, the game’s 2017 home run king with 59, away from the Miami Marlins. 

Here’s an excerpt from The Baby Bombers:

“The Yankees repeatedly downplayed the suggestion that 2017 was intended to be a rebuilding year, but there was ample evidence of how young they were. [Manager] Joe Girardi’s lineup card for the April 2 season opener at Tropicana Field featured Gary Sanchez, Greg Bird, Ronald Torreyes, and Aaron Judge in the batting order – all of whom would still be subject to an under-twenty-five penalty fee if they had attempted to rent a car before leaving the Sunshine State.

“It was the third time in franchise history that the Opening Day lineup featured four players under the age of twenty-five. In 1932, the Yankees had sent out a batch of kids: pitcher Lefty Grove, catcher Bill Dickey, third baseman Frankie Crosetti, and right fielder Ben Chapman. It had also happened in 1914 (first baseman Harry Williams, third baseman Fritz Maisel, shortstop Roger Peckinpaugh, and center fielder Bill Holden), and at twenty-eight years and 334 days, the average age of the Yanks’ Opening Day roster was its youngest in at least twenty-five years.”

3 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.