Ukraine's army accused of using cluster munitions in urban areas

A fragile cease-fire in eastern Ukraine hasn't ended the fighting. Human Rights Watch says Ukraine's army has fired cluster bombs into populated areas and has called on Kiev to sign an international treaty banning their use.

Evgeniy Maloletka/AP
Smoke rises after shelling in the city of Donetsk, Ukraine, on Monday. Daily battles continue in the region despite a nominal cease-fire being in place between Ukrainian forces and pro-Russian rebels.

Human Rights Watch says it has evidence that Ukrainian government forces fighting pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine have indiscriminately used cluster munitions, a weapon banned in much of the world.

The New York-based watchdog group released its findings in a report late Monday. The report details the suspected use of cluster munitions earlier this month in Donetsk, a rebel-held city with a peacetime population of more than one million. Cluster bombs are designed to explode before impact and scatter tiny explosives over a large area. 

"It is shocking to see a weapon that most countries have banned used so extensively in eastern Ukraine," Mark Hiznay, senior arms researcher at HRW, said in a statement. "Ukrainian authorities should make an immediate commitment not to use cluster munitions and join the treaty to ban them."

The watchdog group said it found signs of cluster munitions attacks in more than 12 locations in eastern Ukraine, where more than 3,700 people have been killed in fighting since April. It said the attacks had killed at least six people and wounded dozens, but that the toll could be higher.

While it could not conclusively account for each attack, HRW said in its report that "there is particularly strong evidence that Ukrainian government forces were responsible" and that their use of the munitions "may amount to war crimes." HRW said rebels may have used the munitions, too. 

A New York Times investigation also found physical evidence — supported by interviews with witnesses and victims — of cluster munitions fired by Ukrainian forces into Donetsk. Two attacks on Oct. 2 and Oct. 6 wounded at least six people and killed a Swiss employee of the International Red Cross, the Times reports.

The allegations could undermine the fragile cease-fire signed by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and pro-Russian rebels in September. It could also jeopardize long-term peace negotiations in the area. As the Times reports:

If confirmed, the use of cluster bombs by the pro-Western government could complicate efforts to reunite the country, as residents of the east have grown increasingly bitter over the Ukrainian Army's tactics to oust pro-Russian rebels ...

The army's use of cluster munitions, which shower small bomblets around a large area, could also add credibility to Moscow's version of the conflict, which is that the Ukrainian national government is engaged in a punitive war against its own citizens. 

Ukrainian military officials have denied the accusations to reporters, while rebels have not commented.

HRW reports that 114 countries have joined the Convention on Cluster Munitions, an international treaty that bans the stockpile or use of the weapons. In addition to Ukraine, Russia and the US are among those that have not joined it, the BBC reports.

Meanwhile, a new report from Germany's foreign intelligence agency (BND) found that pro-Russian rebels were responsible for shooting down Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine in July. The crash killed 298 people. 

BND President Gerhard Schindler told a parliamentary committee earlier this month that his agency had "ample" evidence to implicate the rebels , Der Spiegel reports. He refuted Russian claims that Ukrainian soldiers shot down the plane with a missile.

However, the German investigation concluded that the missile launcher used to down the plane was Ukrainian, not Russia. It said rebels had captured the launcher from a Ukrainian base. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.