UN inspectors get rare access to suspected Iran nuclear site

Tehran confirmed today that UN inspectors can visit Parchin, a military complex where a chamber for explosives tests has raised concerns about Iran nuclear weapons development.

Herwig Prammer/Reuters
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Yukiya Amano attends a board of governors meeting at the United Nations headquarters in Vienna March 5. The United Nations nuclear watchdog chief said on Monday there were indications of 'activities' taking place at an Iranian military site which his inspectors want to visit as part of an investigation into Tehran's atomic activities.

Iran has agreed to let United Nations inspectors into a military complex suspected of nuclear weapons development, a day after the top inspector warned he had "serious concerns" over activities at the site.

The semi-official Iranian Students' News Agency reported Tuesday that Iran's mission to the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna confirmed inspectors would be allowed to visit the Parchin military complex, located near Tehran. "Parchin is a military site and accessing it is a time-consuming process, therefore visits cannot be allowed frequently ... We will allow the IAEA to visit it one more time," the statement said.

The Parchin complex is a weapons development site, reports Al Jazeera English, where Iran built a large containment chamber to conduct explosives tests, according to an IAEA report last year. The report said that such tests were "strong indicators" of nuclear weapons development. Reuters notes that IAEA inspectors last saw the Parchin site in 2005, but did not see the location where the chamber is now believed to be built.

The IAEA requested access to Parchin in February, but were denied by Iran, which says its nuclear program is peaceful. Al Jazeera adds that Iranian diplomats and IAEA officials have yet to comment on the report, which did not set a date for the inspectors' visit.

The Iranian Students' News Agency report comes just a day after IAEA chief Yukiya Amano expressed "serious concerns" over Parchin. The Associated Press reports that Mr. Amano said there were indications of new activity at the site, which meant that "going there sooner is better than later" for the UN inspectors. AP notes that Amano did not offer an opinion as to whether he believed the activity was linked to suspected new weapons experiments or attempts to clean up previous alleged work.

Also on Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu kept up the drumbeat for war with Iran, telling a conference at the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) that time was running out to act on Iran's nuclear program, reports BBC News. "Israel has waited for diplomacy to work, we've waited for sanctions to work. None of us can afford to wait much longer," he said. 

"The Jewish state will not allow those who seek our destruction the means to achieve that goal. A nuclear armed Iran must be stopped," Mr. Netanyahu said during his keynote speech.

But despite Netanyahu's continued willingness for Israeli unilateral military action against Iran, Time Magazine's Tony Karon notes that, "at a tactical level at least, Israel has become isolated by the many months of saber rattling in the form of statements, leaks and military exercises designed to signal that it might be about to launch air strikes on Iran."

While key Western European countries have joined Washington in imposing unprecedented, crippling sanctions on Iran, none of them supports a military option right now. Instead, Israel’s closest Western allies — the U.S., France, Britain and Germany — have lately been devoting diplomatic energy to restraining the Israelis from starting a war, which is not a position with which the Israelis are entirely comfortable.

The Israeli government may be further constrained from acting unilaterally against Iran by public opinion within Israel. As The Christian Science Monitor's Dan Murphy noted last week, a new poll of the Israeli public found that only 22 percent of Israeli Jews supported a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities without US backing. Some 43 percent favored striking Iran only with US support, with 32 percent opposed to any sort of strike.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.