Bali nightclub bombings suspect stands trial

Umar Patek, accused of building the bomb used in the 2002 Bali nightclub bombings, was captured in January 2011 and began his trial today in Indonesia.

Tatan Syuflana/AP/File
In this Nov. 29, 2011 file photo, terrorist suspect Umar Patek, center, is escorted by police officers as he arrives to testify for his wife, Ruqayyah binti Husein Luceno, who is on trial for immigration violations, at a district court in Jakarta, Indonesia. Southeast Asia's most notorious suspected bombmaker, nicknamed the "Demolition Man," is facing trial in Indonesia for his alleged role in the 2002 Bali bombing.

• A daily summary of global reports on security issues.

The top remaining suspect in the 2002 Bali nightclub bombings went on trial today, more than a decade after the attacks brought international attention to Jemaah Islamiyah, a previously overlooked Al Qaeda-linked group operating in Southeast Asia.

Umar Patek, believed to be a member of the group, is accused of building the bombs used in the attacks, which killed 202 people. He was captured in January 2011, in Abbottabad, Pakistan – the same town where Osama bin Laden was hiding when he was captured and killed by the US – and extradited from Pakistan in August. He began trial today in Jakarta

With Mr. Patek's capture and the trial and execution of the three "masterminds" of the 2002 Bali bombings, authorities say they've made substantial progress dismantling Jemaah Islamiyah, the Associated Press reports. At the time of Patek's arrest, he was one of the region's most wanted terrorists and carried a $1 million bounty.

Patek is also accused of a series of Christmas Eve bombings at churches in 2000, according to AP.

Reuters describes the Bali nightclub bombings as a "watershed" for Indonesia, forcing the secular state, which is also home to the world's largest Muslim population, to "confront the presence of violent militants on its soil." Almost 600 militants were detained after the bombings and most of them have been convicted. The militant threat was greatly diminished as a result, aided by the lack of popular support for violent militants.

Patek faces charges of premeditated murder, bombmaking, and illegal firearms possession, among others, but no terrorism charges because the country's terrorism law came into effect in 2003 and cannot be applied retroactively, according to BBC. Prosecutors said they will push for the death penalty, but Patek may be sentenced to life imprisonment instead.

The 1,540-pound bomb built by Patek – known as "demolition man" for his expertise with bombs – was hidden inside filing cabinets and loaded into a van, which was then detonated outside the two nightclubs, mostly killing foreign tourists. Patek told interrogators he built the bomb using basic household items, such as a rice ladle, a grocer's scale, and plastic bags, the Associated Press reports.

While homemade bombs are commonly used by militants all over, ones as powerful as the one made by Patek – out of household items – indicates an "enormous amount of care and expertise," according to AP. Patek told interrogators he learned to make bombs while at a militant academy in Pakistan from 1991-94 and later in Afghanistan. He was living in Indonesia when one of the plotters of the nightclub bombings asked him about making a bomb for the attacks.

He left Bali a few days before the attacks happened, heading to the Philippines, where he joined local extremist group Abu Sayyaf and trained militants and plotted attacks. Patek was in Pakistan, en route to Afghanistan, when he was caught. He hoped to fight alongside the Taliban or another militant group and had refused an offer to teach at a militant camp in Indonesia, AP reports. 

Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.