NSA spying? Everyone does it.

The latest Snowden revelation in the Washington Post makes it clear that the US and its National Security Agency have lots of foreign help when it comes to intelligence collection.

In this image made from video released by WikiLeaks on Friday, Oct. 11, former NSA systems analyst Edward Snowden (c.) receives the Sam Adams Award in Moscow. At right is Raymond McGovern, a former US government official, at left is former NSA executive Thomas Drake.

The latest scoop to come out of the documents that former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden has been providing to journalists is that the NSA has been harvesting vast numbers of emails and other contacts from online contact lists around the world.

The Washington Post reported yesterday that "hundreds of millions of contact lists" are being sucked up from web servers abroad, many of them inevitably of American citizens. It's the sort of bulk data collection that privacy activists have been angry about. The US isn't going after, say, the contact lists of identified potential terrorists or other foreign intelligence targets. Rather, it appears to be hoovering up everything it can get its hands on. 

But given past Snowden revelations about NSA practices, the fact that the NSA was likely to be doing this kind of thing isn't a surprise. Which is why I find this sentence in the thorough article so interesting: "The collection depends on secret arrangements with foreign telecommunications companies or allied intelligence services in control of facilities that direct traffic along the Internet’s main data routes."

In the debate about NSA data-mining from telecommunications companies and popular Web services like Google, the US has often been framed as a sort of rogue actor - a big bully spying willy nilly on people around the globe simply because it can. For instance, Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald, who broke the first Snowden stories, has crafted his pieces to make the US look as bad as possible, while generally neglecting the spying of other nations.

In a story for Brazil's O Globo based off Snowden material, for instance, Greenwald wrote about US spying on the Brazilian government, while neglecting to mention Brazil's own spying on foreigners and its own citizens. Greenwald resides in Brazil.

In the broader Internet discussion about the revelations, there's been talk about ending the key US role in routing global Internet traffic. Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff is considering measures requiring Brazilian Internet users' information to be stored only on servers in the country. The move is ostensibly to make it harder for the NSA to get at it. Deutsche Telekom of Germany has said it will start channeling all domestic Internet traffic through servers in the country (emails within a country are often bounced through servers abroad), and says it wants an agreement with other telecommunications companies in Germany to do the same

But it's clear that while the US is a data-mining heavyweight, large numbers of other governments are in on the act. A recent story in Ars Technica points out that Germany has legal measures that require email and other Internet services to provide customer data if handed a court order. They're also legally bound from saying if they've received an order for data. While laws vary from country to country, Europe in general does not, at first glance at least, seem like a haven from surveillance.

European Union "law does not explicitly protect against access by European intelligence services, but member states law and practice does," Ralf Bendrath, the senior policy adviser to a German member of the European Parliament, told Ars.  

Elsewhere? Russia maintains a vast domestic surveillance state of its own. A report in Russia last week alleged that the government's FSB security service has installed a surveillance system that will enable them to intercept and read virtually every digital communication in Sochi during the 2014 winter Olympics.

Returning to the Washington Post story, who are the foreign telecommunications companies and foreign governments assisting the NSA? Regarding the first group, the article doesn't say. The story does refer to data collection by an "Australian intelligence service on the NSA’s behalf" but doesn't name any other countries. There are certainly many more. And if foreign governments are willing to collect Internet data on behalf of the US, you can count on it that they're collecting for themselves.

This is not to suggest the expansion of surveillance enabled by the Internet age isn't troubling. It's just that the US is not alone, with many partners and enemies abroad doing much the same. And those countries haven't found their Snowden yet.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to NSA spying? Everyone does it.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today