A big, angry Indonesian protest you may have missed

From a year ago.

Dita Alangkara/AP
Muslim protesters burn a US flag during a protest against the film 'Innocence of Muslims,' which ridicules Islam and depicts the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud, a womanizer, and a madman, outside the US Embassy in Jakarta, Monday.

A small protest outside the US Embassy in Jakarta last Monday (the original version of this story said "Friday," apologies) was rolled into the global Islamopocalypse coverage.

Old friend Arian Ardie pointed out on Facebook that an angry, mostly-Muslim crowd also protested in Jakarta a year ago today. That protest got far less media attention than the one spearheaded by the Front Pembela Islam (Islam Defenders Front) at the embassy on Monday. (I wrote a little bit about the FPI earlier this year). The same number of protesters, more or less, were involved in both, which both started at the Hotel Indonesia traffic circle, not far from the US embassy.

Given recent events I thought the Sept. 18, 2011 protest deserves a little more attention:

What riled those folks up? Jakarta governor Fauzi Bowo said after two horrific gang rapes in the city that women wearing "provocative" clothing were partly responsible for the crimes. He soon apologized.

To be sure, the Islamist protest against the US, over a video clip put on YouTube by an anti-Islam activist, was far more raucous and potentially violent (I've put some footage of the protest -- teargas! shouting! great TV! -- below for comparison). And it certainly should have been reported in the context of a wave of protests across the globe prompted by the insulting YouTube video. But have a look at both protests, and remember that the "Muslim world" monolith is a fiction.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A big, angry Indonesian protest you may have missed
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today