Looming Iranian missile threat to US? Pshaw.

Evidence points to Iran being years away from having missiles that can reach the US – although it already has missiles that can reach Israel. 

Hamed Jafarnejad/Fars News Agency/AP/File
In this picture released by Iranian Fars News Agency, on January 2, a Ghader missile is launched at the shore of sea of Oman during Iran's navy drill.

Israel has been hyping up the likelihood that Iran will soon have missiles that can hit the US. Spencer Ackerman explains why that's probably not true:

From getting all the rocket thrusters to work properly to developing heat shields that can withstand the stresses of rapid atmospheric reentry, Iran is probably many years away from getting an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). The American spy apparatus, which once hyped the Iranian missile threat, has quietly stopping saying when Iran can hit the east coast. And the irony is that it’s taking Iran so long precisely because its missile efforts really are sophisticated.

“The bottom line,” says Paul Pillar, a veteran CIA Mideast analyst, “is that the intelligence community does not believe [the Iranians] are anywhere close to having an ICBM.”

It's in Israel's interests of course to convince the US otherwise, since Iran does have missiles that can reach that country. Israeli Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz said in a CNBC interview on Wednesday. "We estimate that in 2-3 years they will have the first inter-continental ballistic missiles that can reach the east coast of America."

That assessment is far out of line from the United States' current one – not that the US is always right. In 1998 former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Iran was 5 years away from obtaining an ICBM that could hit the eastern US. 2003 came and went without any such breakthrough.

Iran being multiple years away from something scary -- having a nuclear weapon or a really good long range missile -- has been a sort of regular facet of the debate since the late '70s, as this list of dire, unfulfilled predictions makes clear. Former Sen. Alan Cranston of California had Iran seven years away from a nuclear bomb in 1984, for instance.

The predicted decisive time periods have been getting shorter of late. Iran is more technically capable today than it was a decade ago, and if it chose to obtain a nuclear weapon, most technical experts believe it's probably capable of making one or two in a few years. The US intelligence assessment remains that Iran has not yet made that choice.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.