New initiatives aim to prevent poaching

New actions at the supply and demand ends of the ivory trade could help save elephants.

|
Chaiwat Subprasom/Reuters
An official inspects an ivory product during a registration at the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, in Bangkok.

In the late 2000s, the African elephant faced perhaps its biggest challenge yet, with demand for ivory spiking in Asia. But action on the supply and demand ends of the ivory trade could help to curb today’s poaching crisis.

In March, Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta set fire to more than 30,000 pounds of confiscated ivory at Nairobi National Park and pledged to destroy additional stocks. Past Kenyan presidents had ordered such burnings, but this most recent one represents the largest consignment ever destroyed in the country.

Other new initiatives in Kenya are aimed at preventing further poaching: A paramilitary force will bolster enforcement of anti-poaching laws in the nation’s wildlife parks, the Kenyan Wildlife Service has issued a new strategic approach for educating communities that interact with wildlife, and the country has begun collaborating with neighboring countries to share information on both poaching and trafficking. (Drone patrols play a role.)

According to the African Wildlife Foundation, authorities in Ethiopia have arrested more than 700 people for smuggling ivory and, just two weeks after the ivory-burning event in Kenya, the Ethiopian government destroyed its own ivory stockpile in Addis Ababa. It will deploy detection dogs, being trained by the foundation in Tanzania, to Bole International Airport.

Though not as notorious for its role on the demand side, the United States has made moves to control the market with new legislation prohibiting the sale of ivory in a number of states, including Massachusetts and Florida.

Then there are countries like Thailand, where ivory trade is the world’s largest unregulated market, according to the World Wildlife Foundation. As a member party to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, Thailand was forced to take measures aimed at shutting down the illegal market by the end of March. Private owners of ivory objects were required to declare their inventories by late April in order to avoid fines and prison time. More than 38,000 collectors and shopkeepers complied. A day before the deadline, Thai customs officials seized four tons of illegal ivory from Congo.

Efforts have also been introduced in China. Between 2010 and 2012, more than 100,000 elephants were illegally killed for their ivory, according to WildAid, and the organization says that as much as 70 percent of that illegal ivory has made its way into China, or will. A little more than a year ago, though, Chinese officials ordered the destruction of more than 10,000 pounds of confiscated ivory at a public event, a first. And in February, officials from the State Forestry Administration announced a one-year ban on ivory imports. Earlier that month, Action for Elephants, a Britain-based advocacy group, brought together celebrities and conservationists to call on Chinese President Xi Jinping to outlaw the selling and purchasing of ivory in an open letter.

Kathleen Garrigan of the African Wildlife Foundation calls the ban a welcome move, but one that won’t stop poaching on the ground; it applies only to carvings or trinkets brought into the country by travelers.

“Both the time frame and the scope of the ban are too limited,” Ms. Garrigan says. “If China banned all ivory trade ... and for a period much longer than one year, then we would likely see an immediate and precipitous decline in elephant poaching....”

Still, a survey by WildAid found that Chinese citizens’ attitudes about ivory may also be changing. As of last year, about 70 percent of respondents thought elephant poaching was a problem, compared with about 46 percent in 2012. And among Beijing residents who participated in the survey, the percentage of those who knew ivory comes from poached elephants more than doubled from 25 percent to 53 percent.

But not all are convinced that these announcements mean a win for the African elephant. Patrick Gathara, a blogger and political cartoonist in Kenya, says the burning of ivory stocks is mainly for show.

“Every president since Moi, then Kibaki and now Kenyatta, they’ve all burnt ivory. But the fact is they haven’t dealt with poaching as an issue...,” says Mr. Gathara.

Adds Garrigan: “We ... need to see governments from Africa to Asia demonstrate their willingness to go after the well-protected, often well-connected, higher level criminals that operate with impunity.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to New initiatives aim to prevent poaching
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Points-of-Progress/2015/0512/New-initiatives-aim-to-prevent-poaching
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe