Child labor in decline: Life gets better for 94 million children

Ann Hermes/Staff/File
Students work on writing lessons at an early childhood education center next to a brick kiln in Dharke Bazar, Nepal, in April 2016. Better Brick Nepal, a program aimed at eliminating child labor in brick kilns across the country, set up the education center in 2015.

Two ways to read the story

  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 2 Min. )

Almost 100 million more children are getting to have a childhood than at the beginning of the 21st century.

Child labor has dropped by 38% since 2000, according to data from Save the Children. “In 2000, there were 246 million children in labour ... compared to 152 million in 2016,” writes Phoebe Marabi, a senior specialist on child protection with Save the Children in Nairobi, in an email. That progress has come through a range of policy efforts. Education, for example, is an essential area.

Why We Wrote This

When children are allowed an education instead of being forced to work, it has ripple effects for decades. The results include everything from better earnings to healthier families.

Child labor is a tough, complicated issue, says Benjamin Smith, senior specialist for child labor at the International Labor Organization, a United Nations agency. He says the recent reductions are good news, but should be taken with a grain of salt.

“It is not going fast enough,” he says.

One region where there remains much more work to be done, Mr. Smith adds, is Africa.

“There is no country ... exempt from the problem.”

Almost 100 million more children are getting to have a childhood than at the beginning of the 21st century.

Child labor has dropped by 38% since 2000, according to data from international humanitarian organization Save the Children. “In 2000, there were 246 million children in labour ... compared to 152 million in 2016,” writes Phoebe Marabi, a senior specialist on child protection with Save the Children in Nairobi, in an email interview.

Save the Children attributes that progress to a range of policy efforts. Education, for example, is an essential area. Child labor specialists stress the importance of accessible, high-quality schools. 

Why We Wrote This

When children are allowed an education instead of being forced to work, it has ripple effects for decades. The results include everything from better earnings to healthier families.

Social protections are also important; these can include the promotion of decent jobs for adults as well as family access to health benefits and support. Another factor is the establishment of legal standards around child labor.

The last category, says Benjamin Smith, senior specialist for child labor at the International Labor Organization, a United Nations agency, has been key – especially as national governments organize around the issue of child labor and find ways to mobilize various ministries to move the needle. 

Child labor is a tough, complicated issue. It’s been of concern to the ILO since its founding in 1919, according to Mr. Smith. He says the recent reductions are good news, but should be taken with a grain of salt.

“It is not going fast enough,” he says.

One region where there remains much more work to be done, he adds, is Africa.

“In terms of both absolute numbers and in the prevalence rate, sub-Saharan Africa is a particular concern,” he says. “Africa is clearly where we need a breakthrough if we are going to achieve the elimination of child labor.”

Farming accounts for some 71% of child labor – globally, children also work in mines or warehouses and in commercial fishing. On paper, the majority of child laborers are boys, though the number of girls involved in domestic labor is likely underreported.

Children are forced into work as early as age 5, with cascading negative consequences throughout their lives, from lack of education to health issues. “If more efforts can be channeled on prevention rather than response, then this will push the work further,” says Ms. Marabi.

“The composite of a child who migrates with her family, waking up at predawn hours, working in the hot sun exposed to insect bites, using sharp tools, and having her education negatively affected, is somewhat of a typical one,” says Mr. Smith.

“There is no country ... exempt from the problem.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.