Modern field guide to security and privacy

DHS cyber chief to young hackers: Help us protect the grid

At a hacking competition Passcode hosted in Washington, Phyllis Schneck said threats against critical infrastructure "keeps us up at night" – and encouraged young security researchers to partner with the government to help curtail the threat. 

The threat of digital attacks on the country's critical infrastructure, such as the power grid or water sector, "keeps us up at night," says Phyllis Schneck, the department of Homeland Security's top cybersecurity official. And she wants young hackers to help the government protect these systems. 

"There's nothing nerdy about this," Dr. Schneck said. "This is our future. You're going to keep our country safe, you're going to build our systems, you're going to innovate the heck out of this – and bring it on."

Schneck's rallying cry came at a hacking competition Passcode hosted last week, where security researchers – many of them college students – launched digital attacks against internet-connected water systems set up for the contest that nearly caused the containers to overflow. The competitors came to Washington from universities across the East Coast and the private sector, with a goal of practicing the skills needed to defend such systems in the future.

Threats against the grid have been in the spotlight since last December when hackers took out the power in Ukraine for more than 230,000 people in the first-ever known cyberattack to take out a portion of a country's power grid. Schneck's agency helped investigate the high-profile attack, which fueled the need for skilled people who can defend against such threats in the US.

The question the US must answer today, Schneck says, is: "How resilient are you?"

"Remember," she adds, "you're up against people with no way of life to protect, no attorneys and plenty of money. That's a tough adversary."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.