Modern field guide to security and privacy

Can testing outfit Underwriters Laboratories secure the Internet of Things?

On Tuesday, the testing lab best known as UL – and for its stamp of approval on microwaves and TV sets – rolled out standards aimed at securing the growing number of Internet connected products.

Plant inspectors, civilian employees of the US Army Ordnance, Chicago district, tour the Underwriters Laboratories to study latest methods of combating fire, accident, and sabotage. A rotary sprinkler system is demonstrated to the group in Chicago, Jan. 14, 1942.

The testing outfit Underwriters Laboratories that got its start more than a century ago evaluating products for fire hazards is turning its skeptical eye on the Internet of Things.

While the organization – whose UL logo has become ubiquitous on products such as fire alarms and microwaves – already tests many consumer tech gadgets, on Tuesday it's rolling out standards meant to better safeguard the burgeoning market for Internet-connected devices.

UL's arrival into the IoT marketplace is further confirmation of the coming wave of connected devices designed for homes as well as for industry. The research firm Gartner estimates that some 6.4 billion IoT devices will be in use this year and some 20.8 billion will be online by 2020. 

Many cybersecurity experts are already warning that devicemakers aren't doing enough to build in security to IoT devices and have left opening for malicious hackers to access utilities or municipal networks via vulnerable devices.

Using the new standards, some of the 600 experts UL has dedicated to cybersecurity efforts will examine source code in connected devices, hunting for vulnerabilities and looking at components that could be particularly susceptible to errors. Devices that meet the IoT standards will be certified as "UL 2900 compliant." The first round of testing will focus on industrial and medical products. UL has published an outline of the standards – but the full set costs nearly $800 online.

The UL announcement comes after the February release of the White House's Cybersecurity National Action Plan – aimed at helping government agencies and businesses defend networks against computer attacks. In fact, several US government agencies helped develop UL’s IoT standards.

And as more connected equipment and sensors enter the workplace and homes, other efforts are underway to help secure these devices. 

Last summer, noted security researcher Peiter Zatko, aka Mudge, announced he was leaving Google to launch a government-backed "CyberUL" project. But since then, Mr. Zatko has not offered specifics. Karl Kasper, another well-known security researcher, also envisioned a similar idea in a 1999 paper.

But some security experts worry that applying UL standards to cybersecurity will only help part of the problem when it comes to fixing software vulnerabilities.

"There’s so much in the software it’s impossible to certify every little component of it," said Robert Graham, president of the cybersecurity firm Errata Security. "It’s like you’re trying to certify an aircraft carrier by only looking at the outside shell of the boat."

This story has been updated to include additional information about the cost of UL standards. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to