Modern field guide to security and privacy

Law enforcement e-mails highlight entrenched camps in Tor debate

A New Hampshire library's experiment to support the Tor browser initially alarmed an official within the state's Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. 

Joe Uchill/The Christian Science Monitor
Protesters outside the Lebanon Public Library gathered to show support for running a Tor relay at the New Hampshire library.

At a public hearing last week, city officials in Lebanon, N.H., voted to restart a server in their public library that is part of the Tor anonymous Web browser. The decisions came in response to a flood of support from privacy advocates and civil libertarians after officials temporarily shut that server down.

E-mails obtained by the New Hampshire American Civil Liberties Union and shared with Passcode highlight the entrenched camps in the debate: law enforcement, who often deal with the worst-case scenarios of anonymity technology – such as child pornography – and privacy advocates, who encounter some of its best uses – political freedom and avoiding surveillance. 

The Lebanon Tor relay (which helps expand the Tor network) is the first in a partnership between Tor and the Library Freedom Project, which encourages public libraries to provide their users with access to privacy software. When Ars Technica announced the relay’s launch in late July, it caught the attention of a special agent at the Boston field office of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) – a component of Immigration and Customs Enforcement that investigates, among other things, online child pornography.

“Just terrific ... that kid seems to be thinking just an inch past the end of her nose,” HSI Special Agent Gregory Squire wrote (including the ellipses) in an e-mail to Det. Sgt. Tom Grella of the Portsmouth, N.H., Police Department. Sergeant Grella heads up the state’s Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force. The e-mail also included a link to the Ars Technica article.

The Portsmouth officer forwarded HSI’s e-mail to an officer in Lebanon, saying only, “This could be a problem.” That officer then contacted another police officer and requested a meeting with local library officials, according to a Sept. 11 memo.

"The tone of these e-mails betrays the fact that DHS and ICAC don't take the work of community activists like Library Freedom Project seriously," said Alison Macrina, founder of the Library Freedom Project. "However, given the outcome of this incident, they should probably rethink that approach."

Agents in Boston’s HSI office work with images of child sex abuse to track down victims and perpetrators, according to a 2012 Boston Globe profile. The anonymity and encryption provided by Tor can make that task more difficult by obscuring child pornographers’ online addresses and physical locations.

Tor allows anonymous, encrypted Web browsing by bouncing users' Web traffic among multiple servers to obfuscate identifiable information. It's become a popular tool among journalists and dissidents in countries where online surveillance is especially common and protest activities can lead to jail time. But because the browser is easy to use and download, Tor is also used to hide online criminal activity such as the trade in child pornography.

The debate at the Lebanon Public Libraries was not about installing the Tor browser on computers, but about using extra bandwidth at the Kilton Library to host a server that directs Tor traffic to other servers.

"The use of a Tor browser is not, in and of itself, illegal," a spokesperson for Immigration and Customs Enforcement told Passcode in an e-mailed statement. “There are legitimate purposes for its use.… However, the protections that Tor offers can be attractive to criminal enterprises or actors, and HSI will continue to pursue those individuals who seek to use the anonymizing technology to further their illicit activity."

Meanwhile, privacy advocates remain focused on Tor’s use as a tool for freedom of expression in an age where anonymity is increasingly hard to come by. And they see last week’s show of public support for the Tor relay as validation.

“We want to show them that not only is Tor something really special and power, a really amazing tool for free expression,” Ms. Macrina said before last week’s vote. “It has an overwhelming amount of community support, and that the library has an overwhelming amount of community support.”

This article was updated after publication.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.