Michael Phelps wins record 19th medal, but did you see Chad le Clos?

Michael Phelps is now the most decorated Olympian ever after winning gold in the 4x200 relay Tuesday, but his silver-medal race in the 200 fly might have been the highlight of the night.  

Matt Slocum/AP
Michael Phelps poses with his gold medal for the men's 4x200-meter freestyle relay swimming final at the Aquatics Centre in the Olympic Park during the 2012 Summer Olympics in London Tuesday.
Michael Sohn/AP
South Africa's Chad le Clos reacts as he wins gold in the men's 200-meter butterfly swimming final at the Aquatics Centre in the Olympic Park during the 2012 Summer Olympics in London Tuesday.

Now, perhaps we can all understand a bit better what 19 Olympic medals means.

On Tuesday, Michael Phelps won his 19th Olympic medal, as we all knew he would, surpassing Soviet gymnast Larisa Latynina as the most decorated Olympian of all-time.

But it was not in the way we might have expected. Already, there had been a fourth place finish and a second. Then, at the Aquatics Centre Tuesday, he came in second again, in the 200-meter butterfly, before (at last) finishing first as anchor of the 4x200 freestyle relay.

Surely, some will find a few of those colors in his new medal collection strange. Before London, Phelps had never had a silver. Coming in second in the 200-meter butterfly – an event he had not lost at a major international competition since 2000 – could seem like a little tarnish on the end of a golden career.

But did you see Chad le Clos’s face when he touched the wall 0.05 seconds ahead of Phelps? Think back for a moment. Wasn’t that Phelps’s face in Beijing? Weren’t those Phelps’s fingertips touching the wall in Beijing?

And there you have the story of these Games – one in some ways far more engrossing than a repeat of Beijing.

Now, we have an inkling of just how hard it is to beat a world that has trained four years toward the sole goal of making you look silly. In 2008, sometimes though sheer force of will, it seemed, Phelps foiled the world. This time, however, it is not just the Michael Phelps Show.

How many toppings?

These Games are different, Phelps has said. He got his sundae in Beijing. Now, it's more a question of "how many toppings I want" – like the Olympic medal record. And that has made for a kinder, gentler Phelps here. 

After his silver-medal performance Tuesday, he said: “I got a bit too serious two days ago. So I just got to relax and smile and have fun.”

Two days ago, if you’re counting at home, was Sunday, the day after Phelps finished fourth in the 400-meter individual medley. It was the day he swam in the second leg of the 4x100 relay. And it was also the only time that the Phelps we came to know in Beijing has made an appearance here. For 100 meters, he was the predator again – the well-earned smile of satisfaction replaced by a snarl of wounded pride.

On Tuesday, however, South African le Clos was the predator.

Is it even conceivable that someone would have caught Phelps in the last 25 meters in Beijing, as le Clos did here?

Milorad Cavic can answer that question. That race, it was Phelps's fingertip on the wall first – by 0.01 seconds. 

To le Clos, Tuesday was his sundae – his eight-gold-medal moment, the validation of an entire career wrapped into 1 minute and 52.96 seconds.

“Phelps is my hero, and I love the guy,” he said. “To beat him – I can’t believe it. You don’t understand what this means to me. This is the greatest moment of my life.”

All-arounders humbled

This Olympics was supposed to be the golden age of the American all-arounder – the Phelpses and Ryan Lochtes and Missy Franklins who seemed poised to win seven medals a piece. Instead it has been a bumpy return to reality.

Phelps fourth on Saturday. Lochte fourth on Monday. Then Ms. Franklin fourth in the 200-meter freestyle Tuesday.

That reality is no disaster. It just looks different from Beijing.

It looks like Allison Schmitt. Is anyone aware that the US freestyle swimmer has as many medals as Phelps and is well placed to get another Wednesday?

It looks like Matt Grevers and Nick Thoman, the only two Americans to engineer a gold-silver sweep at these Olympics (in the 100-meter backstroke).

And it looks a lot like Yannick Agnel, the French swimmer who roped Lochte in Sunday’s relay to win gold and then sent tremors through the Aquatic Centre with a nuclear last 50 meters in the 200-meter freestyle Monday – in front of French President François Hollande, no less.

Phelps’s only words to his teammates in the 4x200 relay Tuesday night? “I told them to give me the biggest lead that they could.”

He was facing against Agnel, who finished second and was closing rapidly.

“If I didn’t get a big enough lead, then who knows what would have happened,” Phelps conceded.

Yes, Tuesday was Phelps’s night, with a golden ending richly deserved.

But, like the rest of London Olympics, Tuesday was not all about Michael Phelps.

And perhaps that’s not all bad.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.