US women dominate gymnastics, Wieber falls short

The Americans finished 11 points ahead during the preliminary rounds of women's gymnastics. But world champion Jordyn Wieber was knocked out of the all-around finals by teammate Aly Raisman.

Brian Snyder/Reuters
Jordyn Wieber of the US hugs teammate Gabrielle Douglas during the women's gymnastics qualification during the London Games July 29. Wieber will not be going to the women's all-around finals, though Douglas and teammate Aly Raisman will.

As a team, the Americans lived up to their billing as heavy favorites in Olympic gymnastics.

Except for world champion Jordyn Wieber.

The U.S. women breezed through qualifying Sunday, throwing down a challenge to Russia, Romania and defending Olympic champion China. Wieber, however, will miss out on the all-around final after finishing behind Aly Raisman and Gabby Douglas. Countries are limited to two gymnasts in the all-around and event finals

The Americans finished with 181.863 points, more than 11 ahead of second-place Britain. That, despite Wieber, Douglas and Kyla Ross bouncing out of bounds on floor exercise, their last event.

The team final is Tuesday, and the scoring starts from scratch.

The Americans have entered the last two Olympics as world champions, only to leave without a gold medal. But this team is stronger, top to bottom, than the 2004 and even 2008 squads, and it has a swagger LeBron and his buddies would appreciate. They know they're good — routing Russia by four points at last year's worlds — and they don't much worry about anyone else.

The setup worked in their favor, too, with the Americans starting on vault, their strongest event.

All four of the Americans do Amanars, one of the toughest vaults in the world — a roundoff onto the takeoff board, back handspring onto the table and 2.5 twisting somersaults before landing. It's got a start value — the measure of difficulty — of 6.5, a whopping 0.7 above the vault most other gymnasts will do, and it gives the USA a massive advantage after just one event.

Even worse for rivals, the Americans make those vaults look easy. Gabby Douglas' toes were so pointed in the air she looked like a directional arrow while McKayla Maroney's legs were ruler straight. Each American took a hop on their landing, but it was a minor deduction and the U.S. left the event with a score of 47.633.

They held their own on uneven bars thanks to Douglas and Ross, who missed last year's world championships because she was too young and now flits between bars like a hummingbird, weightless and graceful. Douglas, dubbed "The Flying Squirrel" by national team coordinator Martha Karolyi because of her release moves, wowed the crowd by flipping so high above the bar she could have changed the overhead lights.

Her feet slammed into the mat on her dismount, and delighted coach Liang Chow sprinted around the end of the podium, pumping his fist.

Douglas scored a 15.333, and the Americans were cruising.

But Wieber was already showing signs of trouble. The U.S. champion came in as the heavy favorite for gold, having lost only two all-around competitions since 2008 — both to U.S. teammates. But she lost to Douglas at the Olympic trials earlier this month, and wasn't her normal rock-solid self.

She had a form break on a handstand on uneven bars, and a few wobbles on balance beam. After Ross and Douglas flew out of bounds on floor exercise, Wieber got way too much power on one of her tumbling passes and had to take a step back to steady herself. Only problem: It was out of bounds, and the deduction all but ended any chance she had of staying in the top two.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to