Carter: Saudis support the Iran nuclear deal but have doubts

US Defense Secretary Ash Carter met with Saudi Arabia's King Salman and his defense minister in Jiddah on Wednesday. The Saudis 'reiterated their support' for the deal, but with reservations, Carter said to reporters after the meeting.

Carolyn Kaster/Reuters
US Defense Secretary Ash Carter (l.) meets with Saudi Arabia's King Salman bin Abdul Aziz (r.) at Al-Salam Palace in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Wednesday, July 22, 2015. Carter flew into Saudi Arabia for meetings on Wednesday with King Salman and his security leadership to reassure the kingdom of America's support after Washington struck a nuclear deal with its arch-rival Iran.

Saudi Arabia's King Salman and his defense minister support the Iran nuclear deal but have doubts about how effectively the historic agreement will be enforced, U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said Wednesday.

The Saudis appear to have reconciled themselves to the Iran deal, judging from Carter's comments.

Carter spoke to reporters after meeting in Jiddah with the king and Defense Minister Mohammad bin Salman Al Saud.

"They both – the king and the minister of defense – reiterated their support" for the deal, Carter said. "The only reservations we discussed were ones that we clearly share, namely that we attend to verification of the agreement as it's implemented," and the use of a "snap-back" mechanism for quickly re-imposing sanctions on Iran if the Islamic Republic cheats on any part of the agreement to limit its nuclear program to peaceful pursuits.

"Those are the same issues that we know will arise" as the deal is implemented, Carter said.

Some experts say reinstating sanctions would be more difficult than the term "snap back" implies.

What Carter described as Saudi support for the Iran nuclear deal stands in contrast to Israel's strong opposition, which Carter heard in blunt terms Tuesday in a meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

For strikingly similar reasons, the Saudis and the Israelis worry that the nuclear accord will embolden and strengthen Iran. Israel fears it will clear a path for Iran to build nuclear weapons for potential use against the Jewish state, while the Saudis worry that a nuclear Iran could trigger a regional arms race. Both also worry that an Iran freed of economic sanctions would strengthen its support for Shiite proxy groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon, posing greater danger to Israel, and the Houthis in Yemen, on the Saudi border.

Saudi Arabia sees Iran as its chief regional and ideological foe, as well as its rival in the OPEC oil cartel. The Saudis decry what they call Iranian efforts to undermine Sunni dominated Gulf Arab states, and their military intervention in Yemen is evidence of how deeply they worry about Iranian support for the Shiite Houthis rebels.

The Saudis see the Houthis, with military support from Iran, as giving Tehran a foothold on Saudi Arabia's doorstep. In addition to providing arms to the rebels, Iran has placed a small number of military advisers in Yemen to train the Houthis to use those weapons, according to a senior Western diplomat who spoke to reporters in Jiddah. He spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence information.

Carter said he discussed the Yemen crisis with the Saudi leaders as well as plans to extend U.S.-Saudi military cooperation, including joint training and efforts to improve the kingdom's defenses against ballistic missiles and cyberattack.

In his exchange with reporters after meeting with Saudi leaders, Carter was asked whether the Saudis are overstating the extent of Iranian support for the Houthis.

"The Iranian influence with the Houthis is real," he said, "and we have taken steps to check Iranian ... resupply of the Houthis. He added that the U.S. and Saudi Arabia agree that the Yemen civil war has no military solution and must be resolved through a political settlement.

Carter also said the 79-year-old king will visit the United States in September. It would be his first trip to Washington since assuming the throne in January.

President Barack Obama invited the king to a summit with Gulf leaders at Camp David, the U.S. presidential retreat in Maryland, in May, but Salman declined.

In an exchange of pleasantries as he greeted Carter at Al-Salam Palace, the king said he wished he could have attended the Camp David gathering, adding, "During that time there was a difficult situation in Yemen," according to an official Saudi translator.

A Saudi-led coalition launched an aerial bombing campaign in Yemen in March aimed at rebels, known as Houthis, who seized Yemen's capital, Sanaa, in September. More than 1,690 civilians have been killed since the airstrikes began, the United Nations said Tuesday, and Yemen is suffering a major humanitarian crisis.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.