Iran's supreme leader said to approve military cooperation with US

The BBC reports that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has approved joint military efforts with the US to contain Sunni militants in Iraq. The unconfirmed report comes amid signs of de facto US-Iranian cooperation. 

Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP
In this picture released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks in a meeting with Iranian ambassadors in Tehran, Iran, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2014. Khamenei on Wednesday dismissed the value of direct talks with the US, his first comments touching on meetings that officials from the Islamic Republic had with Americans dating back to secret talks that began in 2012.

Iran’s top commander has been authorized to coordinate military operations with US, Iraqi, and Kurdish forces battling Islamic State (IS) militants in northern Iraq, according to a report today by BBC Persian, citing sources in Tehran.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is said to have approved military cooperation with the US, a longstanding adversary, in the fight against what Tehran and Washington view as a common and growing threat.

A source close to Mr. Khamenei quickly denied that report to The New York Times' Tehran correspondent, however, and government officials later echoed the denial.

Even without an official stamp of approval, both the US and Iran have found themselves on the same side of the Iraqi battlefield since Baghdad's forces collapsed in northern Iraq and Islamic State militants surged in recent months.  

The US launched airstrikes against IS positions that broke a two-month siege on the northern town of Amerli last weekend. Concurrently, Iranian military advisors were on the ground guiding an eclectic mix of Kurdish peshmerga forces, Shiite militias, and Iraqi Army troops.

Images posted online show Iran’s Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, wearing a cap and a checkered scarf but no military insignia, in a desert area purported to be near the Amerli frontline in Iraq. The hardline site Raja News today published photographs of Maj. Gen. Soleimani praying with others at the front.

Yet any US-Iran “coordination” in the latest iteration of war in Iraq is likely to be tactical only, given decades of mutual hostility between the two nations. And past cooperation efforts – especially in Afghanistan, where Iranian officials and the Revolutionary Guard provided critical targeting and other information to US forces after 9/11 against the Taliban – did not yield any substantial thaw. Iran also helped the US to bolt together a post-Taliban government in Afghanistan. Nonetheless, President George W. Bush declared in 2002 that Iran was part of an "axis of evil," a slap in the face for Tehran. 

Nuclear deadline

The Iraq fight comes as both sides are locked in talks to limit Iran’s nuclear program; top diplomats from both sides are now meeting in Geneva in a bid to bridge gaps to meet a November deadline for a final deal. Added to the long list of possible spoilers: the Washington Post’s Tehran correspondent Jason Rezaian, a dual US-Iranian citizen, and his Iranian journalist wife Yeganeh Salehi, have been held in detention in Iran for more than 45 days without charge.

And while both sides may be finding common cause in crushing IS, both have waged a covert war that has seen the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists, the Stuxnet computer virus, and unexplained explosions and sabotage. Washington calls Iran the leading “state sponsor” of terrorism, and in recent years a sting operation found an Iranian used-car salesman in Texas guilty of plotting to assassinate the Saudi Arabia ambassador in a Washington, DC restaurant.

Iranian officials in Tehran this week described attempts to recruit Iranian scientists abroad, and showed imported equipment for nuclear work that had been tampered with and sabotaged. “We aim to raise awareness about the enemy, who is more hostile to us every day,” Asghar Zarean, the head of security for Iran’s nuclear program, told the Associated Press.

Mr. Khamenei has repeatedly warned that the US can’t be trusted. In the past, he has limited or ruled out direct contacts with the US, depending on internal politics in Iran, for example, and the state of nuclear talks.

Yet analysts note that Iran’s foreign policy has long been rational and pragmatic, particularly when it comes to its nuclear program. The two most recent US National Intelligence Estimates on Iran, in 2007 and 2011, both noted that Iran adhered to a “cost-benefit analysis" of nuclear strategy. 

Proxy battlefield

Until now, Iranian and US officials have downplayed the possibility of directly working with each other, despite sharing the same battlefield. In mid-June, Sec. of State John Kerry said he “wouldn’t rule out anything that would be constructive,” but that first it had to be seen “what Iran might or might not do before we start making any pronouncements." 

Both sides are aware of the deep irony of de facto cooperation, in a war zone in which they previously fought each other, through proxies and sometimes directly, after the US-led invasion in 2003.

Freeing Amerli was a rare success against IS, and Iran has received credit for its backup role.

“The Iranians had a role in this. They supplied weapons and helped with the military planning,” a Kurdish peshmerga commander told Reuters this week, in a district near Amerli called Suleiman Beg. The Iranians had trained the Shiite militias, he said, and helped Kurdish units target their artillery fire. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.