Iraq offers lessons on destroying Syria's chemical weapons

Iraq is the only other country that has been forced to surrender its chemical weapons.

Bilal Hussein/AP
A convoy of inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons prepares to cross into Syria at the Lebanese border crossing point of Masnaa, eastern Bekaa Valley, Lebanon, Tuesday.
IMAGES: Google/Digital Globe, GRAPHIC: Rich Clabaugh/Staff
There are believed to be four production sites (red squares on the map), all of which have to be destroyed by Nov. 1.

When Syria's application to the Chemical Weapons Convention comes into effect Oct. 14, the country will become the 190th member state of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW).

But many aspects of Syria's entry into the CWC and the plan to eradicate its arsenal are firsts. No other signatory has been required to surrender its chemical weapons in such a short time – the July 1 deadline is only nine months away. It is also the first time that the OPCW will be operating in a country at war, adding danger and complexity to the task.

Since the CWC came into effect in 1997, seven countries have turned over their chemical arsenals: the United States, Russia, India, Albania, South Korea, Libya, and Iraq. Iraq is the only other country compelled by international pressure, rather than unilaterally volunteering, to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) program.

Between 1991 and 1999, the UN Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) scoured the country for chemical and biological weapons and ballistic missile systems.

"It turns out we were much more successful with UNSCOM than we knew at the time. I estimate that we probably eliminated maybe 80 or more percent of the Iraqi chemical inventory in roughly [the first] 18 months," says Charles Duelfer, a former acting chairman of UNSCOM and later the head of the group that conducted the post-2003 invasion investigation into Iraq's WMDs.

Most of Iraq's chemical weapons were transferred to two vast bunkers, where they remain under lock and key while experts ponder how to destroy them. "Where it was feasible, we transported the old agents to that facility. If it was too dangerous or they were leaking, we tended to blow them up in place [in fire pits dug into the sand].... We would put cans of heating oil around them and detonate it," Mr. Duelfer says.

Fire pits are unlikely to be used in Syria because of environmental concerns.

Libya joined the OPCW in 2004 after relinquishing its WMD program to improve ties with the West. A little more than half the estimated 23 tons of chemical weapons had been destroyed by the time the uprising began in February 2011. The new Libyan government revealed the existence of an additional stockpile of chemical weapons – the first time a signatory to the CWC admitted possession of a previously undisclosed chemical weapons stockpile.

See related story on how OPCW will dismantle Syria's chemical weapons

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Iraq offers lessons on destroying Syria's chemical weapons
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today