Faulty signal caused Seoul subway crash

A faulty 'go' signal likely caused one subway train to plow into another in Seoul Friday, injuring more than 240 people. Passengers described chaos following the crash, and were evacuated through the tracks.

A subway train got a faulty 'go' signal before it plowed into another train in the South Korean capital, slightly injuring more than 240 people, the subway operator said Saturday.

Though the case is still under investigation, the malfunction in the automatic distance control system is presumed to have caused the crash Friday afternoon, Chang Jung-woo, CEO of Seoul Metro, told reporters.

"Normally, the signal should be given in the order of 'stop' and then 'caution.' But at the time of the accident the signal was given in the order of 'stop,' and then 'go-ahead'," Chang said.

The driver of the moving train applied its emergency brakes after noticing the stopped train ahead, but wasn't able to halt it in time, Chang said.

Hospitals treated 249 people, mostly for bruises and minor injuries, though three had surgeries for broken bones, according to Seoul Metro.

Lee Dong-hyun, a passenger on the moving train, described chaos after the crash. "It stopped suddenly ... and everyone screamed," he said. Lee said the door leading to the next car was crushed and couldn't be opened.

The report said the crew of both cars instructed passengers to evacuate and walk to the next station through the tracks. The announcement on the stopped car was made right after the accident, while the moving car told its passengers to wait inside, then announced an evacuation seven minutes after the accident.

People in South Korea are mindful of safety practices, or lack thereof, because the captain of the ferry that sunk April 16, killing hundreds, has been condemned for waiting 30 minutes to issue an evacuation order as the ship sank.

Associated Press writer Hyung-jin Kim contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.