Rwanda's former intelligence chief on trial for genocide

The trial of Pascal Simbikangwa, which began Tuesday in Paris, is expected to take several weeks.

Rwanda's former intelligence chief faced genocide and war crimes charges Tuesday as his trial began for a 1994 killing spree that left at least a half-million people in his nation dead.

Pascal Simbikangwa, 54, could face a life sentence if convicted after the seven-week trial, the first in France over Rwanda's genocide — two decades after the bloodshed.

The case has highlighted criticism of France's own reaction to the slaughter of at least 500,000 people in Rwanda in just over 100 days.

The defendant, infirm from an auto accident years ago, was wheeled into a glassed-in area in the courtroom. He identified himself as "Pascal Safari," a combination of his real name and his alias, Senyamuhara Safari, according to court documents.

More than 50 witnesses — including journalists, historians, farmers, security guards and intelligence officials — are expected to testify, nearly all for the prosecution.

Several French human rights groups and the Collective of Civil Parties for Rwanda, which has worked to bring such a case to French courts, are among several civil parties.

"I am especially dedicating this (trial) to the anonymous victims of Pascal Simbikangwa, those without a name, a grave. This is for them today," said Dafroza Gauthier, who says she lost at least 80 family members in the genocide. She and her husband Alain set up the collective in 2001.

Simbikangwa's defense team has expressed concern that the trial will be lopsided — in part because of the difficulty in finding witnesses who will speak out in his defense.

"We'll do what we have done from the start — plead for a not-guilty verdict," said defense lawyer Fabrice Epstein, claiming the facts haven't been fully established.

On Tuesday, presiding judge Olivier Leurent went over the history of the genocide and claims against Simbikangwa, noting that the defendant had rejected them.

France had close ties to the government of Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, an ethnic Hutu who was killed when his plane was shot down in 1994. His death set off a torrent of reprisal slayings of ethnic Tutsis and moderate Hutus, in what has been called the 20th century's fastest genocide.

Civil parties to the case say Simbikangwa, who came from the same town as Habyarimana and was allegedly a relative, was in the president's inner circle. From at least one roadway checkpoint in Kigali, he is alleged to have incited the army to identify and slaughter Tutsis.

Though not accused of personally killing anyone, he faces charges of complicity in war crimes and complicity in genocide.

France, critics say, was slow to react to the slaughter. Before the killings, French troops had armed and trained the Rwandan army and during the genocide, they allegedly helped radical Hutus flee the country. Later, France took in a number of exiles who have lived for years free from prosecution.

France was condemned by the European Court of Human Rights in 2004 for acting too slowly to prosecute one Rwanda genocide case.

A French trait for "ill-founded self-certainties" that engulfed "the administration, the army and the diplomatic corps" was to blame, according to French former Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, who made repeated trips to Rwanda during the genocide as a humanitarian aid activist.

"Today's trial in Paris ... will be an important moment in the global fight against impunity," said Leslie Haskell, the international justice counsel for Human Rights Watch.

"France now has the tools it needs to ensure (that) perpetrators of the world's most serious crimes don't escape justice or find a safe haven in the country," she said in a statement, noting the creation of the war crimes unit two years ago.

The Justice Ministry says another 27 cases linked to Rwanda's genocide are being investigated, including one focusing on Habyarimana's widow.

The UN tribunal on the Rwanda genocide and several Western countries — including Belgium, a former colonial overseer of the African country — have brought scores of Rwandans to justice. The UN International Criminal Tribunal in Arusha, Tanzania, will close later this year, and is now only hearing appeals, officials say.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.