Ban Ki-moon, UN Security Council slam Israel on settlements

The UN chief and every Security Council member other than the US, which remained silent, denounced on Wednesday Israel's plans to expand its settlements.

Ronen Zvulun/Reuters
An ultra-Orthodox Jewish man on Tuesday walks in Ramat Shlomo, a religious Jewish settlement in an area of the occupied West Bank Israel annexed to Jerusalem. Israeli officials said they would press on with plans this week to build 6,000 homes for settlers on land claimed by Palestinians, defying criticism from Western powers who fear the move will hit already faint hopes for a peace accord.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and all members of the Security Council except the United States criticized Israel on Wednesday, demanding an immediate halt to new settlement construction.

Representatives of the 14 council members stepped to the microphone outside the council chamber after its monthly Mideast briefing to denounce the Israeli settlement plans, which they warned are threatening a two-state settlement with the Palestinians. The move was clearly aimed at intensifying pressure on Israel and demonstrating the isolation of the United States on the issue.

The council president, Morocco's UN Ambassador Mohammed Loulichki, said 14 countries made the statements because efforts to get the council to agree on a resolution or statement had failed.

Separately, Mr. Ban told reporters that Israel's heightened settlement activity "gravely threatens efforts to establish a viable Palestinian state."

"I call on Israel to refrain from continuing on this dangerous path," he said.

"The Middle East peace process is in a deep freeze," he said. "The two sides seem more polarized than ever, and a two-state solution is farther away than at any time since the Oslo process began" in the 1990s.

Peace talks that resulted from the Oslo process have been frozen for four years, in large part because of the settlement issue. The Palestinians refuse to negotiate while Israel expands its settlements, which are now home to more than 500,000 Israelis.

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans to build thousands of homes in settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, the Palestinians' hoped-for capital, in response to the UN General Assembly's decision last month to upgrade the Palestinians' status to a nonmember observer state. Israel opposed UN recognition of a Palestinian state, saying it bypassed peace negotiations.

The United States, Israel's closest Mideast ally, voted against the Palestinian statehood resolution and vetoed a Security Council resolution backed by the 14 other members in February 2011 that would have urged a halt to all settlement building. But the Obama administration is growing increasingly frustrated with recent Israeli announcements on new settlement activity and other issues clearly aimed at punishing the Palestinians for the General Assembly vote.

US officials made no statement Wednesday. But in a rare, stinging rebuke of a close ally, US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland on Tuesday accused Israel of engaging in a "pattern of provocative action" that runs counter to the government's commitment to peace. She said settlement activity puts the goal of peace "further at risk"

Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian UN envoy, said Wednesday that the strong US statement indicated that "there is unanimity against settlement activity."

"Now, the ball is in the court of the Israelis," he said.

Mr. Mansour warned that with UN recognition of the Palestinian state, "if the Israelis continue to ignore the wishes of all of us, and if they continue to decide to destroy the two-state solution then we will be able to resort to all possible options available to us to defend ourselves and our people in a better way."

He did not elaborate but this could include the Palestinians seeking to join the International Criminal Court and then urging the tribunal to prosecute Israel.

Israel's UN Ambassador Ron Prosor accused Security Council members of ignoring the Syrian government's Scud missile and fighter jet attacks this week "to single out" plans to build "Jewish homes in Jerusalem, the capital of the Jewish people. "

He said the major hurdle to peace is not settlements but the Palestinian insistence on the right of all Palestinians to return to Israel and its refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state.

Representatives of the 14 council members, however, stressed that settlements are a major hurdle.

A statement from the four European Union members – Britain, France, Germany, and Portugal – strongly opposed the Israeli plans, especially in a corridor known as E1 which would separate the West Bank from east Jerusalem, jeopardizing a contiguous Palestinian state and the possibility of Jerusalem as the future capital of both Israel and Palestine.

"The viability of the two-state solution is at stake and must be preserved," the EU statement said. "A bold demonstration of political will and leadership is needed from both sides to break the current impasse and resume negotiations."

India's UN Ambassador Hardeep Singh Puri – speaking on behalf of the eight council members in the Nonaligned Movement – Morocco, Colombia, Togo, Pakistan, South Africa, Guatemala, and Azerbaijan – condemned the recent Israeli settlement plans as "the foremost obstacle to peace."

Russia's UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said Israel's settlement activity especially in the E1 area and suspension of transferring tax and duty revenues to the Palestinians "put in question" the two-state solution, a view echoed by China's deputy ambassador Wang Min.

He also called for a ministerial meeting of the Quartet of Mideast mediators – the US, UN, European Union, and Russia – to be held "without delay" to discuss a way forward.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Ban Ki-moon, UN Security Council slam Israel on settlements
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today