How France views Lance Armstrong fall from grace

In France, some say Lance Armstrong epitomized 'impunity' and represented a 'generation of cheats.' They hope the stain of doping in Tour de France will end.

(AP Photo/Christophe Ena, File)
Lance Armstrong during the Tour de France cycling race in Gueugnon, France, in 2010. Armstrong said on Thursday that he is finished fighting charges from the United States Anti-Doping Agency that he used performance-enhancing drugs during his string of seven Tour de France victories.

As news broke that Lance Armstrong is to be stripped of his Tour de France titles for doping, there was more than a whiff of Schadenfreude in the home of the Tour de France, the epic race the Texan dominated for nearly a decade.

French cycling veterans lamented the stain on the world's most famous bike race, but the newspapers felt justice was finally being done and online commentators asked whether France might now see more of its cyclists on the podium.

"Armstrong personified impunity. He was seen as too well protected to fall. So the big message today is that impunity is over," said Damien Ressiot, a sports reporter who published the first doping allegations against Armstrong in the sporting daily L'Equipe seven years ago to the day.

"What is a shame is that by saying he accepts the decision, Armstrong will avoid a public debate so we'll never know exactly what happened and how he was able to cheat for so long."

IN PICTURES: Lance Armstrong's career in cycling

Beating testicular cancer to win the Tour an unprecedented seven times, Armstrong, clad in the leader's yellow jersey, came close to personifying the race from 1999 until his retirement last year, popularising it with millions of Americans.

He also became an inspiration for those diagnosed with cancer worldwide.

On Thursday, Armstrong dropped his fight against doping charges, and the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency said he would be stripped of his titles and banned from competitive cycling.

While the American, who speaks basic French, was always publicly cheered in the country that made him one of cycling's greats, many people regarded him as standing for a generation of cheats who always seemed to get away with it.

"The rotten years of cycling have been identified and Lance Armstrong is out," Jean-Rene Bernaudeau, head of French cycle racing team

Europcar, told Reuters. "We are working as hard as we did then and we have better results. French cycling has regained its standing."

Veteran French racing cyclist Laurent Jalabert, widely popular in France though he never won the Tour, told RTL radio he felt sadness and anger at the blight on both the Tour de France and the wider world of professional cycling.

"The axe has fallen," wrote daily newspaper Le Figaro in its online edition. "Some people will be furious but others will see justice being done."
Le Monde said Armstrong's downfall should serve as a turning point for the sport. "Saint Armstrong, pierced with arrows, has finally succumbed," the newspaper said in an editorial. "This illustrates anew that this sport is poisoned by doping."

Many in France are angry at the way doping has come to overshadow the glory of a punishing three-week race that courses 3,500 km (2,200 miles) through the mountains and valleys of France at breakneck speed and has been held every year, except in wartime, since 1903.

While French cyclists have over the years been most successful in the event, winning 36 of the 94 tours, the last Frenchman to win was Bernard Hinault back in 1985.

Since then, American and Spanish riders have dominated, with Armstrong and Spaniard Miguel Indurain recording seven and five wins each. This year's Tour was won for the first time by a Briton, Olympic gold-medallist Bradley Wiggins.

"That's it -- we are going to have a Frenchman back on the podium," one online reader of L'Equipe commented in reaction to the Armstrong story.
"At last!" said another. "Everyone knew (Armstrong) was guilty -- he was the only one able to talk without panting when he got to the top of a hill."

The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency has based its case on eyewitness accounts that Armstrong, along with other leading Tour de France cyclists, were injecting themselves with the blood booster EPO, testosterone and other performance-enhancing drugs.

While Armstrong is only one among several Tour de France champions accused of doping, he is by far the most prominent.
Bernard Thevenet, who won the Tour de France twice, said stripping Armstrong of the titles that have made his fortune and turned him into a global brand would send a clear message that things have changed.

"If Armstrong cheated then it's perfectly reasonable that he should be punished," he told RTL radio. "It's a very strong message for cyclists and those around them who might be tempted to cheat."

Ressiot, for whom Armstrong's fall feels like vindication for his years-long quest to get recognition for his claims that urine samples from Armstrong in 1999 had tested positive for EPO, said the best outcome would be to set up a much more stringent testing system.

"Of course this hurts the Tour's image, but the stain from doping affairs of the last 15 years was already catastrophic so I don't think anyone is surprised. The problem today is that all great sporting results are viewed with suspicion," Ressiot said.

"I am saddest for the cancer sufferers who made Armstrong a hero. He biggest crime was to lie to those people," he said.

IN PICTURES: Lance Armstrong's career in cycling

(Additional reporting by Chrystel Boulet, Brian Love, Gregory Blachier and Pierre Serisier; Editing by Giles Elgood)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How France views Lance Armstrong fall from grace
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today