Sudan allows aid into border areas after oil deal struck with South Sudan

The border areas are facing an impending famine. An oil transit fee deal between Sudan and South Sudan is a move toward ending conflict between the two nations. 

Margaret Aguirre/Reuters
Refugees arrive at the Gendrassa camp in Maban, Upper Nile State, South Sudan, on the border with Sudan, August 1. According to the International Medical Corps, an estimated 120,000 refugees have fled violence and hunger in Sudan into camps in South Sudan.

Sudan agreed on Sunday to allow aid into two rebel-held southern border states where humanitarian groups say fighting has left civilians facing an impending famine.

The move came a day after Sudan reached a deal with South Sudan over oil transit fees, a first step to ending a dispute which had brought the hostile neighbors close to war in April.

Both countries still need to mark their disputed frontier and improve security in the violent borderland, one of several issues left over when South Sudan seceded a year ago under a 2005 agreement that ended decades of civil war.

The African Union said it had brokered the deal between Sudan and rebels of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-North) to allow aid into rebel-controlled areas in the border states of South Kordofan and Blue Nile.

Famine warnings

According to the United Nations, almost half a million people have been displaced from fighting between the SPLM-North and the army in the two states, which border South Sudan. The United States and aid groups have warned of famine.

Sudan has agreed on a limited ceasefire in some rebel-held areas as a first step to allow aid in, said Kamal Obeid, head of the Sudanese delegation at the talks in Addis Ababa.

He gave no details but said aid would be distributed only under strict Sudanese supervision with security forces having the right to search shipments and approve staff delivering it.

Obeid told reporters Khartoum would hold more talks with the SPLM-North after the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan but doubted they wanted to end fighting.

"We have very big doubts about the other side.... They are not serious about reaching a peaceful solution," Obeid said before Sudanese and AU officials signed the aid agreement.

The SPLM-North is part of an alliance with rebels in the western Darfur region. The rebel groups accuse the government of marginalizing their people.

Security deal

Obeid reiterated Sudan would only implement the oil deal allowing crude exports from the landlocked South through the north after the implementation of a comprehensive security deal banning any ties between the South Sudanese government in Juba and the SPLM-North.

Khartoum says the SPLM-North is supported by Juba, a claim some diplomats find credible despite official denials. South Sudan itself accuses Sudan of often bombing its territory, which Khartoum denies.

"We will execute it only after ... an end of political and military engagement [of the SPLM-North with South Sudan]," he said.

"We will not fund South Sudan's treasury to attack Sudan," he said, referring to border fighting with South Sudan in April.

South Sudan's army temporarily occupied the disputed oil field of Heglig, which contributed to much of Sudan's oil output, but said it had acted only after an attack from Sudan.

Oil is the lifeline for both countries struggling with economic crises after South Sudan shut down its oil output in January to stop Sudan taking oil for what it called unpaid pipeline fees.

Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir is under pressure from his National Congress Party not to make too many concessions to South Sudan and especially the SPLM-North which hardliners consider a natural enemy.

* Additional reporting by Khalid Abdelaziz, Editing by Rosalind Russell.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.