Can Japan stop deaths by overwork?

A changing economy and traditional work culture are putting large numbers of Japanese employees at risk of dying from overwork, its labor ministry says.

Andy Nelson/ The Christian Science Monitor
Commuters are jammed into subway cars during the morning commute in Tokyo, Japan, on October 1, 2008.

The 2014 death of 27-year-old Filipino trainee Joey Tocnang was a case of karoshi, or death from overwork, said Japan’s labor ministry this week.  

It’s just the second time the Japanese government has officially attributed a foreign trainee’s death to overwork, a designation that makes the deceased person’s family eligible for compensation. But for Japanese workers, it’s quite common: the ministry determines hundreds of deaths to be karoshi-related every year, and labor advocates say the real number is much higher.

"The government hosts a lot of symposiums and makes posters about the problem, but this is propaganda," said Hiroshi Kawahito, secretary general of the National Defense Counsel for Victims of Karoshi, in an April interview with Reuters. "The real problem is reducing working hours, and the government is not doing enough."

The ministry’s decision comes just weeks after it reported, in its first white paper on the subject, that as much as one-fifth of the country’s workforce could be at risk of dying from overwork. And there are other signs that Japan’s government could be getting serious about a problem that it has acknowledged since the 1980s, but done little to successfully alleviate. 

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who was elected on a promise to jumpstart the country’s economy, has appointed a panel to draw up reforms aimed in part at reducing overtime – one that might even include capping the number of monthly overtime hours that an employee can legally work. And as CityLab noted in September, lawmakers at the local and national levels have taken steps, including a plan in Tokyo to deploy “overtime prevention teams” at municipal offices.

About 23 percent of the 1,743 companies surveyed in the white paper said that at least some of their employees put in more than 80 hours of overtime per month, the official threshold for potentially deadly overwork, according to the Japan Times. In certain fields, such as communications, research and technology, and trucking and postal services, the percentage rises to well over a third.

In 2000, the Japanese supreme court ruled that companies were responsible for ensuring that employees did not endanger their health by overwork. But karoshi has been on the rise since then, partly for structural reasons – older workers are retiring, and with fewer younger workers to replace them, some companies are facing labor shortages – and partly for cultural ones, as The Christian Science Monitor noted in 2000:

In contrast to the West, where the work habits of leaders and top executives are considered hazardous to their health, in Japan karoshi is mainly applied to lower-level employees who are compelled to work too hard.

Some experts blame karoshi on manufacturing companies' attempts to eliminate "waste time" from the days of their assembly-line workers. Other observers have noted that Japan's group-oriented society makes it hard for individuals to strike out on their own by leaving work on time if everyone else is working late.

The common expression a worker would use in leaving an office ahead of her co-workers translates to: "I'm sorry to be leaving before you." At crunch times in companies and bureaucracies, sleeping at the workplace is routine.

Those attitudes are changing among younger employees, who are more likely to take advantage of paid time off. But the demographics of karoshi victims are also changing, from the traditional picture of men in salaried office positions to young women in temp jobs.

Migrant trainees, whose ranks have swelled as the government seeks to ease the labor shortage, are also particularly vulnerable. The labor ministry says that Mr. Tocnang, a trainee at a casting company who died just three months before he was scheduled to return home, could have been logging as much as 120 hours of overtime per month.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.