Saudi bombings: Why targeting of Medina is particularly significant

Bombs rocked three Saudi Arabian cities on Monday, the second to last day of Ramadan. The Muslim holy month has been particularly bloody this year, with over 300 deaths in attacks from Orlando to Dhaka to Istanbul.

Courtesy of Noor Punasiya/AP
People stand by an explosion site in Medina, Saudi Arabia, Monday. State-linked Saudi news websites reported an explosion Monday near one of Islam's holiest sites in the city of Medina, as two suicide bombers struck in different cities.

Three Saudi Arabian cities were rocked by suicide bombers on Monday. The attacks took place near the US consulate in Jeddah, near a Shi'ite mosque in Qatif, and outside the Prophet's Mosque in Medina, the second-holiest site in Islam. 

Religious and political leaders have expressed outrage, particularly for the strike on the mosque where the Prophet Muhammad is buried. The attacks came just before sundown on the second to last day of the holy month of Ramadan, when Muslims fast from dawn to dusk. Many worshippers had gathered at the mosque to break their fast.

The blasts "prove that those renegades ... have violated everything that is sacred," said Saudi Arabia's supreme council of clerics, according to Agence France-Presse (AFP).

The attack on the Prophet's mosque was the most deadly, killing four security officers. There has been no claim of responsibility.

Pilgrims from around the world make their way to the mosque, also known as Al-Masjid an-Nabawi, during the final days of Ramadan each year. According to the Saudi-owned Al Arabiya News Channel, two million worshippers had arrived at the Medina mosque as of Monday.

The attacks may have been to undermine the Saudi royal family, suggests Madhawi al-Rasheed, a visiting professor at the National University of Singapore's Middle East Institute. "It's an attempt to actually embarrass the Saudi government because it boasts of protecting the pilgrims and the holy places," she told AFP.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef bin Abdul-Aziz, who is also the Saudi interior minister, was quoted by the state news agency SPA saying, "The security of the homeland is good, it is at its highest levels and thanks be to God it gets stronger every day," during a visit to three people who were injured during the attacks, according to Reuters.

The Muslim holy month of Ramadan has been particularly bloody this year, with over 300 deaths in attacks from Orlando to Dhaka to Istanbul. 

The vast majority of Muslims see Ramadan as a time to fast, pray, ask for mercy and blessings, and for good actions. But some radicals see the holy month as time for "conquest and plunder," according to Shiraz Maher, a member of the Department of War Studies at King's College London and deputy director of its International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence. 

Dr. Maher writes for the BBC:

Ordinary Muslims rightfully despair at these interpretations of jihad and its link to Ramadan. 

For them it is a month of restraint and reflection – but such is the crisis of modern Islam that extremist interpretations of the same idea are almost wholly divorced from normative understandings.

To the radical mind, if additional prayer and alms giving is encouraged in Ramadan – then why not more bloodshed too?"

Although the terrorist organization has not claimed responsibility for Monday's attacks in Saudi Arabia, the self-proclaimed Islamic State militant group did call for supporters to engage in such violence during Ramadan.

Maher writes, "As Ramadan approached, IS spokesman Abu Mohammed al-Adnani told supporters around the world; 'Get prepared, be ready to make it a month of calamity everywhere for the non-believers ... especially for the fighters and supporters of the caliphate in Europe and America.' "

The attack on the Prophet's mosque has drawn condemnation from diverse Muslim leaders. As AFP reports:

"There are no more red lines left for terrorists to cross. Sunnis, Shiites will both remain victims unless we stand united as one," Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said on Twitter.

Lebanon-based Shiite militant group Hezbollah – which Saudi Arabia accuses of supporting "terrorist acts" across the region – also denounced the Medina attack as "a new sign of the terrorists' contempt for all that Muslims consider sacred."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to