The queen keeps quiet about 'Brexit'

Queen Elizabeth II's mandate is to 'act as a focus for national identity, unity, and pride,' according to the monarchy's website.

Carrie Davenport/Reuters/Pool
Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke Of Edinburgh (unseen) attend the unveiling of the Robert Quigg VC memorial statue in Bushmills village, Northern Ireland.

While the entire world has been reeling from the vote last Thursday for Britain to leave Europe, Queen Elizabeth II has continued her two-day 90th birthday tour of Northern Ireland, including a visit to the UNESCO World Heritage site, the Giant’s Causeway, with Prince Philip, Duke Of Edinburgh.

Elizabeth has not yet released an official statement about Brexit, but on Monday she made her first official appearance after the vote when she met with Northern Ireland’s deputy minister, Martin McGuinness, and Arlene Foster, first minister of Northern Ireland.

When Deputy Minister McGuinness asked how she was doing, she responded, “I’m still alive, anyway.” She continued to say, “I’ve had two birthdays, so we’ve been quite busy.” The queen’s second birthday, following tradition, was celebrated with the Trooping the Colour ceremony. The publicized meeting was civil and short.

The monarchy did not vote on Brexit per tradition, and was quiet during the politically tense period before Brexit as well, even going after the tabloid newspaper The Sun, which published a front page article that said the queen supported Brexit. The Independent Press Standards Organisation ruled that the paper had breached media regulations by publishing an inaccurate headline after Buckingham Palace complained.

The monarchy’s website states that the queen acts as a “focus for national identity, unity, and pride; gives a sense of stability and continuity; officially recognises success and excellence; and supports the ideal of voluntary service.” However, as The Economist notes, the queen is still Britain’s head of state, with powers to sign treaties, wage war, and dissolve Parliament.

Britain has seen immense prestige come from their monarchs’ image, as well. Not least George VI’s role in giving “a sense of stability” during World War II, as depicted in the wildly popular four-oscar-winning movie “The King’s Speech.”

Although the monarchy costs Britons £45.6 million per year, or $61.25 million, according to The Telegraph, the royals are also a major tourist draw for the nation. A Buckingham Palace tour, costs £21.50 per ticket (about $29). 

Last year, the Crown Estate paid a record £285 million, $382.84 million, in revenue, to Britain, which shows that keeping the collected, graceful, and non-political face helps the nation. The queen is considered a major UK cultural icon, not a political player.

According to a YouGov survey from 2015, the monarchy continues to be popular among British people of all ages and political parties. The survey stated 68 percent of the British public believes the institution is good for the country.

A survey by Ipsos-MORI, a British marketing research company, that has been running for the past 23 years has also shown that the monarchy remains consistently popular, with only 17 percent of respondents saying they would prefer a republic in February and 18 percent favoring a republic in 1993.

So as David Cameron resigns as Prime Minister, and the rest of Europe and the world considers how to respond to the referendum vote, the queen and her husband are scheduled to continue their trip to Scotland – a country that, like Northern Ireland, voted to stay in the EU.

Following proper etiquette, political opinions are unlikely to be shared during royal small talk.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.