Demolition of Calais 'Jungle' continues, but where will occupants go?

The French plan to demolish a portion of the migrant camp in Calais resumed Tuesday. Where the occupants of the southern portion of the 'Jungle' will go after demolition is still unclear. 

REUTERS/Pascal Rossignol
French CRS riot police group near burning shelter during protests by refugees and migrants occupying homes in the "Jungle," Feb. 29, 2016. France has started a plan to demolish the camp.

French efforts to dismantle the migrant camp in Calais resumed on Tuesday after a night of unrest.

Moving behind a front line of police, workers entered the migrant camp in the north of France and demolished shanty-town buildings by hand with bulldozers looming behind. On Monday, French police in riot gear had clashed with migrants and protesters. Remaining protesters have occupied roofs in the area, but no open conflict had been reported by Tuesday morning.

Last week a French judge approved the planned demolition of the southern portion of the migrant camp, which has become known as the Calais “Jungle.” A census conducted by the aid organization Help Refugees estimated that 3,455 people live in the affected portion of the camp.

Where will the occupants of the camp go after the demolition? Government officials and nonprofit groups disagree on the answer.

"This operation will continue in coming days, calmly and methodically, providing a place for everyone as the government has committed," French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve told the Associated Press on Tuesday.

French officials have stated that refugees from the “Jungle” have several relocation options. The government has built a new shelter out of converted shipping containers. Remaining occupants could relocate to other refugee camps that are scattered across France, which they said should offer a better standard of living.

“But as of two days ago, there were only 140 places left in the container camp, and yesterday there was just one bus,” Nico Steven from Help Refugees told the Guardian. “I’m not sure where people are meant to go.”

Many of the “Jungle” migrants have also not been given time to prepare or plan their relocation, say critics of the government action – little as one hour notice before the demolition of their property in some cases.

“They said they were going to be doing this slowly and gently – and with our cooperation,” Clare Moseley, the founder Care4Calais, an aid organization operating in Calais, told The Washington Post. “Let’s just say that has not happened.”

The Belgian government has also express concerns migrants will seek to leave France in response. The neighboring country has increased security at several border crossings with France in an effort to prevent “tent camps like Calais” in Belgium, according to Interior Minister Jan Jambon.

Although the method of removal and relocation of the camp has been criticized, the recent demolition is the result of months of political pressure for France to act on the Calais migrant camp.

The camp’s location has strained the valuable trade pipeline in Calais between Britain and France. Migrants desperate to cross the English Channel to the UK have damaged ferries and large trucks making the crossing. Truckers have reported bricks, blocks, and other dangerous items thrown at their trucks from bridges in the area, causing many British truckers to refuse to drive through Calais, according to the Telegraph.

Likewise, humanitarian pressure to address the "Jungle" grew exponentially after a September study by the University of Birmingham criticized living conditions in the camp. The study found the conditions amount to a "humanitarian crisis."

"Internationally agreed standards for the provision of aid and protection in refugee situations are nowhere to be found in Calais.... This is a blight on Europe, who should and can do better," the study states.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.