Eight Egyptian museum officials face trial over King Tut's broken beard

Officials at the Egyptian Museum are awaiting trial under charges of negligence after they tried to cover up damages to King Tut's mask, a 3,300-year-old relic. 

Amr Nabil/Associated Press
In this Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2015 file photo, German restorer Christian Eckmann begins restoration work on the golden mask of King Tutankhamun over a year after the beard was accidentally broken off and hastily glued back with epoxy, at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. Egyptian prosecutors have referred to trial eight restorers involved in the botched repair of the famed golden burial mask of King Tut, which was corrected late last year.

It’s a curator’s worst nightmare: A clumsy museum-goer knocks over a priceless artifact, perhaps causing irreparable harm. Except, in the case of King Tut's solid-gold burial mask, on display at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, the culprits were the curators themselves.

Egyptian prosecutors said eight museum employees will be charged with negligence in the problematic handling of King Tutankhamun's mask when its blue-and-gold braided beard fell off. In the ensuing scandal that local media later dubbed “Tut’s disgrace,” the broken piece was glued back on with an ample amount of epoxy.

But conservators noted that the glue has since caused additional damage to the 3,300-year-old artifact made of 11 kilograms of pure gold.

The initial accident took place in August 2014, but prosecutors did not begin their probe into the damage until last year. When news of the scandal finally broke, public outcry went as far as calling for the discharge of Egypt’s Minister of Antiquities, Mamdouh Eldamaty.

The eight employees currently awaiting trial include the former director of the museum, which contains the world’s most extensive collection of Egyptian antiquities, as well as three restoration experts and four conservation officials at the Ministry of Antiquities.

“The accused violated the scientific and professional rules in dealing with the relic although they presumably know that its value and importance goes beyond the local borders,” a prosecution statement said.

The investigators added that the employees at hand acted with “gross negligence” and violated the professional rules of the workplace during a period between August and November 2014. The reattachment of the beard piece was not scientifically sound. The employees, prosecutors said, not only handled the repair “recklessly” but also tried to cover up for their subsequent actions. They allegedly used sharp instruments to remove the epoxy, causing scratches and damages that remain on the mask.

"The [museum] officials dealt recklessly with a piece of an artifact that is 3,300 years old, produced by one of the oldest civilizations in the world," the Administrative Prosecution said Saturday in a statement to state-run Ahram Online.

A date has not been set for the trial.

Since the initial incident took place in 2014, the involved parties have given different accounts of what actually happened. A museum conservator said the beard was first knocked off during cleaning, but others said the piece loosened with age.

Last October, following a donation of about $54,000 from Germany, a team of conservators under German expert Christian Eckmann undertook re-repairing the mask. Removing the adhesive device and using beeswax instead, the German-Egyptian crew was successful –  King Tut’s mask was back on public display two months later.

The artifact was discovered by British archaeologists Howard Carter and George Herbert in 1922, along with King Tut’s largely intact tomb. The discovered relics went on display 20 years later, and has remained at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo’s famous Tahrir Square.

Tutankhamun, who became pharaoh at age 9, was part of Egypt’s 18th dynasty, ruling from 1361 to 1352 B.C.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.